-3
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Before anything else, I would like to say that I admit systemd has brought great change to GNU/Linux. sysvinit wasn't the best, and custom scripts for every distro is a pain I'd rather not have.

With that said, Poettering now works for Microsoft, systemd has basically taken over all of the common/popular distributions (if this is about the argument of "systemd making it easier for developers", disclaimer: I don't know. I'm not a developer), and this has led to a rampant monopolisation of the init system.

Memes aside, this has very real consequences. If you don't want another CentOS-style "oof, sorry, off to testing" debacle happening with your init system, might want to look at the more "advanced" distributions that let you choose the init system.

I am well aware that systemd works well for the most part, and that gamers and most other people likely don't care - which is fine, at least for now. I do expect to see a massive turnover in sentiment if something ever happens to systemd (not that I'd like for that to happen, but no trusting RedHat anymore), but I suppose we'll get to it when we do.

My sentiments are well enunciated in this recent post on the Devuan forum: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5826

Cheers!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nachtigall@feddit.de 46 points 1 year ago

and this has led to a rampant monopolisation of the init system.

You will be shocked if you find out that virtually every distro runs on the same kernel. Pure monopolisation! For the freedom to choose!

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

You will be shocked if you find out that virtually every distro runs on the same kernel. Pure monopolisation!

FUCK! What's next? Everything using glibc?

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm a proponent of musl with Alpine, Gentoo and Void. I'm all for it.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I’m a proponent of musl with Alpine, Gentoo and Void. I’m all for it.

Not binary compatible with gibc, so I guess it's a victim of the glibc monopoly then.

[-] banazir@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I'm just waiting for GNU Hurd to be viable myself.

[-] pete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I hear it's completely ready but they only built an ipv6 stack so as soon as everything finishes the quick migration to ipv6 we can all switch to it.

[-] thfi@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

There was choice, but not enough volunteers: https://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

every distro runs on the same kernel.

Still it is super easy to change the kernel in an installed and running system, but compare that to the real PITA to change the init environment on the same system.

[-] hunger@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Last time I tried it was an apt install followed by a reboot. If your distribution claims to support several inits and it is harder than that: Your distribution did a poor job.

[-] ultra@feddit.ro 1 points 1 year ago

But that kernel is still some version of Linux. Good luck installing the Darwin kernel or FreeBSD kernel on arch

[-] Shrexios@mastodon.social 0 points 1 year ago
[-] ultra@feddit.ro 2 points 1 year ago

I only gave that example to prove my point

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GustavoM@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Ring me when systemd starts phoning home to Microsoft and/or installing random microsoft-related packages without my consent.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To M$ maybe not, to RH... dunno.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Whilst I don't think that will happen anytime soon, I do not like how RedHat handled CentOS. With that said, I don't think they are about to put their flagship init system on a testing-only OS (at this point), but I don't know what they will come up with

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Poettering now works for Microsoft

systemd has no copyright assignment or CLA. Poettering could work for Putin and systemd as proper Free Software project would not be affected that much.

this has led to a rampant monopolisation of the init system.

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

That's literally the opposite of a monopoly. You can make a fork of systemd now and call it lemmyd.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah as far as i know Red Hat is still the primary developer... for what that's worth. But I'd worry more about them than Poettering.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I’d worry more about them than Poettering.

Red Hat isn't the Linux distributor that's releasing CLA'ed or copyright assignment shit. The principles of true Free Software work just as well when it's about Red Hat.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Indeed. I should probably have highlighted that better in my post.

[-] jsdz@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

monopolisation of the init system

That's the one thing about systemd that is sort of nice. We don't really need to have more than one init system, and it does a sufficiently comprehensive job of being one. If it were only an init system and nothing else, there basically wouldn't be any remaining complaints about it by now.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Aatube@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you don’t want another CentOS-style “oof, sorry, off to testing” debacle

The major difference is that the CentOS project is basically owned by redhat while systemd isn’t. I do not get this argument. Systemd makes it easier for EVERYONE instead of having to port services across init systems. Unless your alternative has compatibility, I won’t use it.

[-] walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

-- because it's not an argument; it's a vague association of imagery with no explanatory content.

[-] walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

What does Poett.'s current employment have to do with anything, though? Guido van Rossum (Python) & Simon Peyton Jones (Haskell) work at M$; I believe the guy who started Gentoo went on to work there likewise. Same with the lead dev of GNOME. I despise M$ as much as the next man; but correlations like these reek of guilt by association.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Good alternatives: Devuan, Slackware, Gentoo.

Gentoo took the better approach, imo, you can choose your init system. Done.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Indeed. I'd add Void for runit and the BSDs to the list.

[-] hunger@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

might want to look at the more "advanced" distributions that let you choose the init system.

Yeah, sure... integrating a init system is a huge task (if you want to do it properly). Let's do that several times!

[-] BitPirate@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=o_AIw9bGogo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To be honest, I somewhat enjoyed this talk

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Obsolete tech gets phased out all the time. Why do so many people want to treat systemd like some kind of conspiracy? Where's the hate for Wayland, or x86_64?

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I don't have a very high opinion of x64 either, but that's for a different post

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
-3 points (47.8% liked)

Linux

48349 readers
450 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS