13
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SGforce@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 hours ago

Saw someone who's a web developer explain it. It's an error from the department tasked with transcribing/archiving them. Something about a line-break being misread and replacing characters when it shouldn't. Kind of like when you see "&amp&" and junk like that.

[-] shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 hours ago

I suspect they came up with a process for doing the conversions / redactions that worked for the documents they tested it with, and then applied the process to documents in a slightly different format and just didn't notice. The Verge looked into it and couldn't get a more specific answer than this:

With MIME, the “=” is used to signal either that a string of text should be broken for transmission and rejoined — a “soft line break” — or, when followed by two other characters, that it should be converted to a particular non-ASCII mark.

it doesn’t fully explain why the “=” sometimes replaces letters, like the “J” in “Jeffrey.” No one I spoke to could definitively answer this question, except to say that email is hard and converting it to PDF is harder, and the DoJ was converting a lot of documents in a hurry.

https://www.theverge.com/policy/879016/epstein-files-emails-text-errors-encoding

[-] Singular5636@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Mails are often encoded in the "quoted-printable" format. It uses = as an escape character and it is used in different ways. Besides soft line breaks also some special character are encoded using a equal sign, followed by hexadecimal characters. The wiki includes some examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quoted-printable

This might explain the replacement.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

53238 readers
738 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS