308
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 18 hours ago

No project legitimately gets that many stars while having so few issues open

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I'm fairly certain that the account is run by a bot and every single repo and line of code and text (readme, comments, etc.) are LLM slop. It's also probably part of a much larger bot network. Possibly an AI company experimenting with their latest slop-bots.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago
[-] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 1 day ago

Forgot to put "make sure the project compiles" in his .md files. What an amateur.

[-] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Welp, no longer using the work wifi.

[-] ns1@feddit.uk 178 points 2 days ago
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

Closed as not planned

so much brainrot they burned themselves on accident

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 35 points 2 days ago

For those wondering, yes, that was a real issue submitted. There are other issues, and they are great.

[-] markz@suppo.fi 32 points 2 days ago
[-] ulterno@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago

Owner does not plan on getting their brain to function properly

[-] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 100 points 2 days ago

Privacy-First: No cameras required - uses WiFi signals for pose detection

That's not how privacy works.

[-] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

My impostor syndrome suddenly vanished :)

[-] Xylight@lemdro.id 29 points 2 days ago

anyone gonna cop the $1500 hour session for agentic engineering

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'll charge you some beer and a pizza. You can donate the rest $1480

[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Apparently, these stars indicate that this is a good joke.

[-] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 89 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have a visceral "AI" sensor that triggers when I see these:

"Rust Implementation (v2)"

"Performance Benchmarks (Validated)"

Human beings don't self-validate explicitly like that. AI loves doing it.

You generate code, there's a bug, you ask for a fix, your AI of choice will always output with:

*** Fix build issue ***

*** End fix ***

and then call it "Version 2 (Validated)".

Sometimes it's more subtle, but you can feel it, it loves adding "confirmed", "working", "validated".

[-] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 3 points 18 hours ago

"I'm confident in my solution."

Alarm bells.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 53 points 2 days ago

My sensor is much simpler. If I see emoji in headings or bulleted lists, I assume it's shit. It might be AI slop, or it might just be kids getting overexcited with the little pictures, but both deserve suspicion and scrutiny.

If a bunch of the emoji don't even make sense it can get in the bin.

[-] GreyCat@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Ahhh idk, I saw a lot of genuine repos do emojis, at least for headings. Even before LLMs.

I like them 'cause with the right amount, it makes a README easier to parse when quickly scrolling over it.

[-] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago

My changelog generation tools output emojis because our lives are too short to not use 🚀

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago

As an ancient husk of a person, it all looks crack-addled to me. I don't really see how you can parse out headings from emoji because their usage isn't consistent.

[-] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 1 points 18 hours ago

I like putting the little pictures in my readmes sometimes. In my biologically generated repositories. Please don't discriminate against neat little pictures you can just put in text 🐑.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago

Your whimsy hurts me

[-] eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws 38 points 2 days ago

This comment is so true 🚀🚀🚀

[-] Steve@startrek.website 21 points 2 days ago
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago

This comment has been confirmed and validated by an actual human being 👍

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have a project with a bunch of compose files that define the services I self host. I "deploy" the project by sshing into my server and doing "git pull" which means I'm often making changes that don't get tested before committing to source control. As a result I have long chains of commits like:

  • refactor the sproingy widget
  • refactor the sproingy widget v2
  • refactor the sproingy widget working
  • maybe the sproingy widget works this time?
  • ok finally found the issue with refactor sproingy widget
  • fix formatting of sproingy widget

And now I'm wondering if I've been an llm this whole time

[-] yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

Let me introduce you to Ansible

[-] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Why not just edit the YAML directly on the server via a command-line text editor or SSHFS and then push from there when it works?

[-] housedogpartyfavor@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

No the AI would have called it fixed, “production-ready,” committed, and pushed after the first refactor.

[-] exu@feditown.com 13 points 2 days ago

Make your changes in a new branch and rebase/squash when you push it to main.

[-] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

This also means modifying your git pull command to pull the correct branch. A small change perhaps, but may be harder than just committing to main lol.

I had a similar problem with GitHub actions, it was hard to test without messing up the main repo history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I am no programmer and understand almost nothing of the documentation and yet somehow I can tell it's all bullshit.

It reads like a kid making up words in an attempt to sound smart mixed up with the description for a shady Amazon product.

[-] markz@suppo.fi 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I guess it's reading comprehension. Utter bullshit reeks the same regardless of the field.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

That's absolutely awesome!

I'm gonna start referring to this as 'smelling AI slop'

You got the sense to sniff it out, even without programming experience. And that's a damn good sense to have these days 👍

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago
[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago
[-] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

I mean well before AI, it was pretty common that a GitHub repo wouldn't compile.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

Maybe it's just me but most times I try to compile a software project from source, it's gonna take a long time figuring out stuff not mentioned in the readme and I will probably give up in the end.

[-] SGforce@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 days ago

All of YC got bamboozled by this slop.

[-] gkaklas@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago

Throughput metrics

Phase Sanitization 67-85 Melem/s

😆

(Turns out it does exist! But it's just a chemical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melem )

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago

Everyone’s talking about the different things that give it away and here I am with “WiFi dense human pose…” wtf

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You can track/identify people in range of a wifi router based on how the wifi signal is disrupted.

I believe that the original people claimed you could ID individual people using their approach, but I suspect that's under ideal conditions and/or with some training against individual people.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

And this is why I come up with stupid concepts like this, coding without numbers, just to fuck up artificial intelligence...

https://lemmy.world/post/43158470

Sorry I said it was Friday, it was actually Sunday 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] rem26_art@fedia.io 19 points 2 days ago

Performance Benchmarks (Validated) yup, 100% totally validated. It's like when you buy something thats wayy too cheap for what it should be off of Temu and it shows up with a QC and Validation card that they clearly just print on a large sheet and cut down that says QC OK

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 10 points 2 days ago

Oh the fancy ones are separate bits of paper. Mostly they print a qc check with a tick right onto the packaging

[-] exu@feditown.com 14 points 2 days ago

"production ready" sure you are

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
308 points (98.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

30119 readers
416 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS