Cool, go use LLMs. Not sure why you're expecting validation from me, I'll never be impressed by your inability to handle basic tasks and attempt at delegating them to a predictive text generator. I can't do anything about your choices, nor do I care about your lack of skill.
It just means you suck at prompting, which is basically just talking and explaining what you need
I suck at prompting? I didn't write the dozens of papers showing the limitations of LLMs, my guy.
Your joke would work better against the guy boasting about using LLMs, not the one actively avoiding them. Maybe ask a LLM for an explanation as to why.
That's not what I said.
LLMs are demonstrably bad at what they do, and what they do is just very basic writing, research and math.
It's not about things I know or don't know. If you're finding LLMs useful, you're lacking in some foundational skills that everybody should practice and be capable of doing.
I think they worked out that men on average think about sex about 8 times as much
I'll assume you're misremembering the study or reading an article about the study not the paper itself, because otherwise, I'd be terrified at the really bad attempt at doing science if any peer reviewed study published these words.
I love WebKit exploits because they suddenly open up several gaming consoles to homebrew, almost all of them have browsers based on WebKit too.
The only Organic Maps controversy I'm aware of was the presence of certain closed-source elements on what they claim to be a FOSS app, and that the main developer refused to open up, then partially did, then backtracked and never fully released.
Maybe that's what that user is referring to? Not sure.
Even if you fixed the issue with drivers...
...your modem runs it's own firmware with a lot of extremely shady behavior, and you can't touch that regardless of which OS you install. Even your SIM card can arbitrarily execute Java applets and fetch from the network without your command, but at least it's somewhat contained. Your modem though, it can do a lot without your control and people like Qualcomm have been caught doing nasty stuff with it (plus, of course, giving the US the data whenever they ask for it).
This is why people like Stallman and Snowden often talk about teaching users how to use libre software on their computers, but rather than pushing for the same with smartphones, they tell you to not touch these at all instead. They're fundamentally anti-privacy devices, built this way.
Of course I carry one, it's fairly hard to live without a phone nowadays, but we must be aware of the impossibility of fully containing the data harvesting they do.
Why wouldn't the internet survive the fall of capitalism? It started in universities wanting to share information faster, not for profit.
Yes.
That I did not say nor agree with.
Nothing you said disproved anything about "my argument" but sure.