376

A Russian state TV host has celebrated Mike Johnson becoming the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

The Trump-supporting Republican was elected to the role this week after 22 days of deadlock after Kevin McCarthy's ousting earlier in October and failed bids from other candidates, including Jim Jordan.

In a clip from Russian TV channel RTR Planeta, translated by Russian Media Monitor, Olga Skabeeva said Johnson would "suit" Russia because of his stance on Ukraine.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Feirdro@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

That little man is creepy as fuuuuuuuuck

[-] carbonprop@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 19 points 1 year ago

He's yearning back to those exact circumstances. Hence 'conservative'.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

... in this case conservative means regressive.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 points 1 year ago

👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I’ve never known the term to mean anything else.

[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

There are few real conservatives in the US. Generally when they exist, they're called liberals.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 43 points 1 year ago

It's not enough to be a delusional moron, you have to be a corrupt as fuck traitor too, to make it in the Republican party these days.

[-] WorldieBoi@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Okay so if Russia supports the NatC, they probably have him in their payroll.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I'm not from the US and your country's politics don't seem to make a lot of sense most of the time. Why did I never read about a Democrat candidate?

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There wasn't one. The Speaker is chosen by the members of the House. The Republicans hold the majority there so there was really no chance of a Democrat being voted into the position.

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Hakeem Jeffries was the democratic nominee for speaker, but you’re right that there was no chance for him because the republicans hold the majority.

[-] vanontom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And Republicans hold the majority of seats because of ~~cheating~~ gerrymandering. They do not deny this fact, and continue drawing unfair, literally illegal districts as we speak. (They also have the power to write laws ending it, but fair districts would end the GOP.)

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They must have a pee pee tape of him.

Why do people have to imagine such sinister shit as this? Russia just pays him and he does what they say - nothing unusual about that at all.

So the Russian state controlled media Fawns over the guy they helped elect. Somehow not surprised

https://www.newsweek.com/house-speaker-mike-johnson-donations-russia-butina-1838501

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Russian state TV host has celebrated Mike Johnson becoming the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

The Trump-supporting Republican was elected to the role this week after 22 days of deadlock after Kevin McCarthy's ousting earlier in October and failed bids from other candidates, including Jim Jordan.

"Johnson is not only the ultra-right Trump supporter who always voted against aid to Ukraine and made corresponding statements that were considered to be anti-Ukrainian.

She added: "If the new speaker did not swear or make promises to his pro-Ukrainian fellow party members, the budget of aid to Ukraine is in question.

Johnson initially expressed support for Ukraine after the country was invaded by Russia in February 2022.

"American taxpayers have sent over $100 billion in aid to Ukraine in the last year," Johnson said in an X post in February.


The original article contains 437 words, the summary contains 139 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
376 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS