45
submitted 1 month ago by nemeski@mander.xyz to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago

Hey, EA, can you like, invest in making something worth defending with anti-cheat before you start investing in anti-cheat?

While we're here, why would anyone buy a windows-on-arm device? Windows RT should have taught them this lesson that nobody fucking wants windows outside of the begrudging desktop, which is a result of the msofficification of the school education programs, which has since run its course.

I just don't understand consumer computing it would seem.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

While we're here, why would anyone buy a windows-on-arm device? Windows RT should have taught them this lesson that nobody fucking wants windows outside of the begrudging desktop

I think you’re taking the wrong message from this. I don't think the author intended you to read the article and think that EA is targeting low compute ARM netbooks, I think the author intended you to come away thinking that major AAA devs are actively preparing for a landscape in which x86 is no longer the dominate desktop processor architecture/instruction set.

Regardless of how you feel about the company, Macs running Apple processors using the ARM instruction set are proof positive that ARM based cpus can replace x86 in compute scenarios higher than netbooks.

Unless you’re specifically referring to the Windows bit of it, in which case I agree.

[-] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Oh for sure, its the specifically windows bit that I'm confused by.

If you're gonna have to learn new shit, it may as well be better shit.

[-] Elting@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

What you don't understand is that the average consumer just does not give a fuck. The ethics of their purchasing decisions are invisible to them and they can't understand how their decisions leave an impact. This is true everywhere, but it is especially true of gamers. They will buy your slop year after year after year with no qualms.

[-] monotremata@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I suspect they know something we don't about a future XBox ARM handheld.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today -2 points 1 month ago

Who cares if someone cheats. I don't get it.

[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can't sell an online, multiplayer, competitive game experience, with the golden goose of in-game-purchases, if the game is dominated by cheaters. The players will find something else to play.

[-] MurrayL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Cheaters in multiplayer games make the whole experience miserable for everyone else. It’s sociopathic asshole behaviour at its purest.

Cheat in single player all you like, but people who cheat in multiplayer are bad people and should feel bad about their choices.

[-] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

SERVER-SIDE ANTI-CHEATS! SERVER-SIDE ANTI-CHEATS! Most cheaters are blatant, and even in a game with very limited samples (Minecraft Java Edition), there's an anti-cheat that has made blatant cheating almost impossible (Polar). They just want client-side anti-cheats for power over you.

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Cheat in single player all you like, but people who cheat in multiplayer are bad people and should ~~feel bad about their choices.~~ have been beaten more as children.

FTFY

[-] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 month ago

Its more about verifying you're paying them and they have control over you and the software you run.

[-] altphoto@lemmy.today -2 points 1 month ago

Exactly! So no thanks.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
45 points (95.9% liked)

PC Gaming

14551 readers
448 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS