20
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

This needs to involve some time in prison for the guilty.

And Pam is most certainly guilty given her little performances in Congress.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

BUT THE DOW IS ~~OVER~~ ^almost^ 50,000 DOL... 50,000 POINTS!

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 month ago

Trump called in every favour that was owed, used every asset he could to get a second term in the white house, ffs he staged the shooting at that rally so he would win so he could keep those files hidden and considering how much effort there is invested in diversions just to keep everyone's mind of the files.

[-] brownsugga@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The story is not news. Last year we heard that the fbi had 100,000 man hours on people making redactions of trumps involvement; the files aren’t even half of them, and there has been NO video released, blurred or otherwise

The wall st journal is a Murdoch shit rag, we cannot trust ANY US media - NYT, Wapo, WSJ, cnn, msnbc, Fox, they are ALL complicit in the coverup, and actively aiding the fascist takeover of the US government

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So since they wouldn't release over half of the documents. We can assume those all have trump and his buddies in them. Millions of documents on those people specifically.

[-] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I will never understand how the women in this administration cover for the men who raped girls.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

...because gender doesn't dictate if someone is ethical or empathetic.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago

I think there's a complicated kind of fig leaf which is very clearly unethical but it allows these people to retain some dignity.

I'm sure there's a word for it but in criminal justice everyone needs a lawyer to defend them, even someone accused of awful crimes with very strong positive evidence of their crimes. I've heard defense lawyers say that even if they dislike their client, they need to do their very best to defend them or else their lack of defense might be the grounds for an appeal later. That does kinda make sense to me.

The extension of this concept is that everyone gets to make their best argument. Even in business / contractual disputes, both sides have an opportunity to make their best argument, their best version of the truth. "Best version" in this context means, emphasising your best actions and minimising your worst.

I guess this can kind of be corrupted in a way to be "well if I don't spin this for then someone else will", which is where ethics goes out the window really. As in, someone accused of a crime might be entitled to appropriate defense, but someone who's been abusing women their entire life is not entitled to have a government official cover up their behavior by obfuscating details or documents. In the same way, often in a professional role your only recourse if you object to something is to resign.

In summary, Bondi is an awful human but this is how I imagine she justifies that.

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Congress:

The DOJ must provide all the documents, not withold information for sake of saving embarrassment or protecting politicians, and let us see all redactions or they're breaking the law!

Hey DOJ, the DOJ broke the law! Arrest yourself!

We're so smart!

Me:

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

And yet the orange turdsack's name still appeared more times than the rest of the big names combined... quite telling, ain't it?

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It's remarkable that they curated it and the files still show that a large portion of the modern far right was somewhere between acquaintances with and funded by and taking orders from a convicted child sex trafficker.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29548 readers
286 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS