26
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Damn, easy win too, if it goes off nobody would be left to collect.

[-] astraeus@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

inb4 everyone was betting yes so there was no profit and that’s why they pulled it

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago

that isn't how prediction markets work; the house gets their fees regardless.

[-] astraeus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

mb. that’s odd then you’d think the kind of business already hosting betting predictions on wars wouldn’t gaf about nuke predictions. maybe they’ll fire the exec that made the choice

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I think it's actually maybe a bridge too far even for them - it reminds me of this scene in Bowling for Columbine where the brother of Oklahoma City bombing accomplice Terry Nichols reluctantly concedes that there should be some limits to the right to bear arms.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 days ago

Apparently nuclear weapons are a constitutionally guaranteed right!

[-] astraeus@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Isn’t the government already blatantly proven to be profiting from these? I remember something about a white house address ending abruptly because some israeli account bet thousands on it ending early or wtv. surprised actual nuclear war is a breaking point. i guess it’s true you can’t really grift if your country gets counternuked and you die horribly

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
26 points (104.2% liked)

Not the Onion

2953 readers
2 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS