100
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

If Iran were to destroy Mar A Lago, I think we could let it slide.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I unconditionally surrender all of Florida on behalf of the usa.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Bezos and his ilk that fled there can go with it

[-] Wilco@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

Let it slide? No. Medals would need to be given out.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Even if it's a target that's not widely popular, it will be used to push policies that hurt the people of the US more.

That's how we got the patriot act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

They can have all of Florida as far as I'm concerned.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago

I'd have to send a thank you letter

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 37 points 1 month ago

False flag attacks are coming. Mark my words.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Probably also "Iranian election interference" and a need to federalize elections so Trump can avoid the inevitable in November.

[-] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Remember, Trump needs enough reason to cancel elections....

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 month ago

Trump is just trying to bring more people onto the side of supporting his illegal war on Iran by proposing an unrealistic risk of danger to the U.S.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

A danger that he totally incited in the first place by being a bloodthirty moron.

[-] Triumph@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

He's trying to do "wag the dog" without a dog.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Is that because Noem murdered it?

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

~~bloodthirsty moron~~ Slave to Israel

Bibi said "Kill" and he said "how many?" We surely know who's calling the shots here, right?

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Survey says... Our number one answer!!

[-] BScPsych@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

I say he is preparing the people for an ‘act of terror by Iran’, meaning there is going to be a false flag incident. He can then use that to claim war powers and dismantle the last sliver of US-American democracy.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That’s a bingo

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago

Why would this be a shock to anyone? He let hundreds of thousands of Americans die to covid.

[-] AmbientDread@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago

Incoming. One Trump Sponsored false flag act of terrorism coming up.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago

Hilarious watching them push "this isn't a war" over and over again just for Trump to constantly call it a war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

real farquaad energy here

The follow-up is, "Why?"

[-] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Some people say they want a terror attack, to get emergency declarations and steal the midterms. I just hope this is not true. A lot of innocent people would die for few remain in power. I don’t know what to believe anymore.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago

Fascists are in power. That's enough to believe in while you go look for historical examples of fascists being peacefully voted out of office. That ought to keep you busy until oh, his fourth term.

[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

We attacked them. Iran should retaliate on US soil. If they do, blame the trump administration and is its cuckold fetish for Israel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Akasazh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I hope this acceptable risk becomes him.

Like a certain Charles Kirk

[-] 0li0li@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Charlie who? Never heard that name before. Must not have done anything important in their life.

[-] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

He was great in The Shining

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

"Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make"

[-] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Let’s just put this out there. If Iranian cells want to hurt Republicans? I won’t bat an eye. Just don’t hurt non-Republicans. You two can have it out.

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess. I mean IDK LOL.

[-] Kintarian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You first, dick head

[-] BigMilk13@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I would like to get off the ride, now, please.

[-] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There is a lot of talk on foreign news sites that way more U.S soldiers have been killed. All U.S bases in Iran were bombed. Yet only 6 U.S people killed?

That's not how that works.

Mexico and India news says reports were around 500-600 U.S troops.

Gop hiding it so it's not so obvious to us how much they fucked up so that Congress won't be as pressured to stop them. If the American people knew it was 500 casualties already from poor strategy, there would be more outrage.

Considering that the current administration lies about literally everything, I'll trust foreign news more.

https://youtu.be/FFRXNGyrNVI

[-] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Naaah. That’s fanciful tabloidism.

Bases are large. They have hardened bunkers. Iranian missiles and drones are crude. Anyone non-essential would have been evacuated before this all started.

Hundreds - even dozens would be impossible to keep quiet.

duno 500 seams high.

Iranian missiles/drones are not very precise, and they take a while to get there, usualy enough warning time to run from a exposted position to the next bunker.

US bases are huge, just cuz something impacts somewhere on it dosent mean a human is nearby.

I kinda doubt they could even hide 500 dead, even if they tryed.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Lenny@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Iran will attack US soil or the gov will do it themselves as justification to cancel the mid-terms

[-] Major_Tsiom@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

HE should fucking die. I hope they kidnap him and torture the fuck out of him.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
100 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29581 readers
368 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS