76
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago

AMD passed on every single chance to get market share back by charging reasonable prices, they are more than happy to increase prices whenever Nvidia does

[-] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If you don't like it, you can make your own GPU. /s

[-] Kynn@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Rdna 2 was successful, I really thought they were back, the cards were good, they forced nvidia to make a competitive 3070.

And then they threw the ball. I don’t understand.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Fifty dollar less than Nvidia with objectively worse features, it's clearly a winning strategy.

[-] who@feddit.org 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Dr. Jon Peddie, president of the research company and consulting firm, points out the multifaceted nature of the AIB market "squeeze":

"The AIB market, largely supported by gamers, is being squeezed from the bottom by powerful new notebooks and CPU integrated graphics, and from the high end by rising pricing due to competition (supply and demand), memory prices, and Trump administration tariffs that bounce around."

I can't say I'm impressed with the reporting here, which neglects to account for graphics card prices tripling around the start of this decade and never returning to normal. This had already broken the usual upgrade cycle among PC gamers, well before Trump tariffs and memory scarcity arrived.

[-] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

Graphics card price tripling and game graphical fidelity is reaching diminishing returns. It's hard to justify the money not to be able to run new games but to run them on High or Ultra instead of Low or Medium.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago

Especially when high and ultra don’t look that much better than medium and low.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I can’t say I’m impressed with their research, which ~~neglects to account for graphics card prices tripling around the start of this decade and never returning to normal~~ I read a magazine article about a small press release for and made a completely unfounded assumption about

These quarterly press releases from Jon Peddie Research mainly just go over more recent developments in high-level detail. The actual report, which yes is $3000 because it's meant for enterprise customers, covers all of this, which you can verify by reading its description and ToC.

Such unfounded confidence that a professional report studying the cost of GPUs fails to account for some basic shit someone would tell you on Reddit is just arrogance; there's no other word for it.

[-] who@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Such unfounded confidence that a professional report studying the cost of GPUs fails to account for some basic shit someone would tell you on Reddit is just arrogance; there’s no other word for it.

No, it's a reasonable response to years of AIB price reporting that has very often neglected to call out the price gouging that I mentioned. Obviously, I wasn't about to spend $3000 and hours of my time, nor grovel through its table of contents, to find out whether this particular report was an exception that was somehow overlooked in the article that was shared with the public.

Updated my comment to reflect new information.

In any case, your short-sighted assessment of my comment is exceeded only by your rudeness and hair-trigger combativeness. You're not exactly making this forum a nicer place to be. Kindly go take a walk.

[-] reversedposterior@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
76 points (96.3% liked)

PC Gaming

14132 readers
707 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS