The UAE is not about to starve. It maintains strategic grain reserves and holds significant stocks of frozen and packaged foods, meaning the country is not facing a broader food shortage.
I don't know what's scarier. The fact that half the commenters didn't read that far into the article or that they couldn't figure out for themselves that fresh food is not all food.
I think the headline is designed to be misleading - the dramatic tone implies a worse situation than the actual words describe.
It's not how headlines are written now, but it would be more honest to say: Dubai to rely less on fresh food Perishable food in limited supply Fresh fruit and vegetables affected by war in iran
Add to the scary list: that some people think it’s no cause for alarm if a country resorts to grain reserves to survive.
How is the UAE stockpiling frozen foods? Feels like the least cost-effective way for this country to store anything long term as emergency stock.
Thoughts & prayers.
Is that a Harry & David gift box by chance? I caint see shit b/c I caint find my dang spectacles. There they are. Nope. Not Harry & David but much better than they are getting.
Shouldn't they be more worried about water hasn't Iran started targeting desalination plants that are 90% of the supply there (I think).
yes, after the us attacked iran's desalination (which it depends on much less than other countries in the region do) opening the door to in-kind retaliation
Eh, they have been in a what shortage since before this war so it might be more important to them
Explain to me how this doesn’t encourage a United bombing run on both Israel and the states.
They’re starving working class plebs like you and me right now. Something about the internal class war in the states makes me livid about that wherever it’s happening. Viscerally.
A handful of guys decide to shit on one another and the rest of us are supposed to bathe in the excremental splatter and like it. Why FFS?
These same assholes are supposed to be in power for the express purpose of shielding their people from said shit.
Explain to me how this doesn’t encourage a United bombing run on both Israel and the states.
Nukes. The US has a lot of fucking nukes. We've used them before, when a sane government was in control. If anyone bombs the US it will literally be the end of civilization.
That's not hyperbole. This orange fuck will absolutely let the nukes rip.
Israel also has a lot of nukes.
These same assholes are supposed to be in power for the express purpose of shielding their people from said shit.
with the context from the rest of your comment, the fact you still believe this is astounding.
Let them eat those stupid ass chocolate bars
Do they not have land trade routes?
Why drive through a desert when you have a port?
Spec Ops: The Line was a very good game.
Never finished it and won't.
Game directly tells you you can stop killing Civilians at any time by just not playing.
That's kind of silly. I get where you're coming from, but since it's a video game that's telling a story with a beginning, middle, and end, and since the people are not real people in any sense of the word, wouldn't it make sense to just finish it to see how the story ends?
Yeah. The story is on rails. It's not an RPG where you can choose the good path or the evil path. I can imagine feeling bad about playing the evil path in a game where you had the option not to do it. But, if you want to see the story in a linear game like that you have click the mouse in the way required to get to the next save point. Feeling superior about not finishing a game like that is like feeling superior because you read a book where the main character is an antihero, and you chose not to finish the book.
Besides, it's "deep" for a modern AAA shooter video game, but not particularly deep or upsetting in terms of storytelling.
Yeah, it's a cool game, but you could just read Heart of Darkness instead and prob be better off
Dubai had no problem using slaves to build the Burj Khalifa. Maybe they should have their slaves bring some food for their masters?
Perhaps a few cocktails as well
be dubai
build city in the middle of the desert
literally nothing grows here
we import all our stuff
trade blockade
gonna starve
mfw
Also how did people historically live there? Before desalination plants
Most of the Arab peninsula was inhabited by nomadic tribes that continuously moved with their cattle and tents, with the exception of a few scattered cities that thrived on trade and light agriculture (dates).
Obviously far fewer people lived there. They probably got their fresh water from a wadi or an oasis.
They're not going to starve because they have a reserve of canned and frozen foods (as it says in the article), but they won't get fresh food for a while. And, if you live in a modern city, you also import all your food, often from across an ocean.
The problem we're seeing a lot in the modern world is that everything has been ultra optimized. Lots of just-in-time delivery, as little warehousing as possible. Products are bought for the lowest possible cost, even if that means they're shipped from the other side of the planet. When it works, that's fine. But, when there's a disruption it's deadly. I remember at the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine, the price of bread in Egypt skyrocketed since all the grain they used came from Ukraine.
UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, etc. are in a bad geographic situation. They have ports on the sea but to get anything into their countries it has to pass by the Strait of Hormuz. Iran can mess with that traffic any time it wants, and Iran isn't exactly friendly with those countries, or particularly stable. I wonder if those countries have backup plans to ship things in via say Oman.
In XVIII they lived from fishery and hunting clams. In XX they lived from port and trade. In second half of XX they lived from petroleum. Now they live from youtubers who are testing rooms and food there.
It should also be mentioned that considerably fewer people lived there back then.
If they're unable to reopen the strait, perhaps they can force Trump to halt attacking Iran by stopping their own fossil fuel production. Something oil embargo.
The US is less reliant on products which traverse the strait then in the other population center on the planet. It actually may be in its strongest strategic interest to continue on a course which keeps the strait closed, ignoring the humanitarian impact and loss of soft power and goodwill.
True but they can't escape the coming inflation wave. As fossil fuel supply thru the strait decreases, intl buyers would seek to buy from other sources, bidding up prices everywhere. That includes American producers who'd gladly export instead of feeding the domestic demand. This could change if the US gov't decides to move away from free markets and imoses export and price controls.
Maybe a few more gold plated jets will do the trick
That Dubai some time, just not enough
What about Bahrain and Kuwait? How are they doing without the Straits of Hormuz?
But how many toilets do they have left?
No need to brag about it, Dubai.
Then they shouldn’t allow US bases that get them embroiled in unprovoked conflicts.
Shouldn't have been an ally of the US and Israel.
They’re not allies of the US nor Israel but just try to play being allies of everyone, just like Qatar, Turkey or India
If you're hosting some other country's military bases you're either its Ally or its Vassal.
I can understand why they do it, but none the less there's no such thing as a free lunch.
Good.
Who do you think will go hungry first?
The powerful or their slaves?
Goddamnit you're right. Nevermind. Hopefully the elite there will evaporate in a big hellfire.
The slaves for sure, but it also creates a situation where the powerful may not be giving enough food to their security forces, and their security forces turn on them, joining the slaves in outright rebellion.
Not that this will bring more food in, but it could result in some of those "powerful" people suddenly not being so powerful.
Maybe one of those vanity projects could have been a greenhouse or something, but I guess it's too late for that.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/