I wonder if there's a case for the shipping industry to sue the US and Israeli govts
There’s for sure a case, what would the enforcement mechanism be? They would both tell the UN to fuck right off so I guess sanctions? Think that wouldn’t lead to war anyway?
We’re pretty locked into a horrible conflict that will drastically change the global order unless a lot of people in power have Ebenezer Scrooge moments simultaneously
We should be sanctioned, at a minimum. At maximum, someone should launch missiles at our military bases then kidnap our president.
Slapping tariffs on goods from everywhere else in the world is kind of a self-sanction.
They can only punch themselves in the dick so much .. though at this point it looks like they probably enjoy it
I wasn’t suggesting we shouldn’t be, but that will lead to conflict on one level or another
Normally you'd have to pick a jurisdiction to raise the case and then the local court system would deal with it, I assume they would raise it in the US .. so if they won the case the US would enforce it, I guess the US would have some law that saysthe DOD is not responsible for the shit they do though ..
Send Barron in a tug boat.
Didn't you hear? He's too tall for a tugboat
Reverse Gattaca him.
A cat tag, I like where your head is at but don't know how that will improve matters.
I simply don’t see how having Barron in the thick of things makes them worse. And in theory maybe it makes things better for our ~~pawns~~ service members forced into this incredibly important mission.
Can't risk sending military equipment into places where it might be attacked.
Can't make this up.
I view this as Naval commanders looking out for their personnel. Why would they risk escorting commercial activities if they're not directly ordered to? That isn't their primary mission/objective. The war is completely stupid and the vast majority of people do not want to be involved, but the US and Israeli billionaires are insisting to poke the hornets nest. That doesn't mean commanders on the ground/water want to put their lives on the line for what's an obvious bullshit conflict designed to enrich said billionaires.
There's good reason navy has moved far away from Iran. They've struck targets accurately far further than the 10km off their coast that is the Straits. Likely more Americans killed than reported in GCC. The Navy is refusing not only because it is a certain suicide mission that fails, but also because of the extreme embarrassment risk of that certain failure.
The US is not a 2020 fighting force, it is an 1980’s fighting force based on nostalgia, which is why it lost iraq and Afganistan. It is why it is not ready to lose a 3 billion dollar aircraft carrier to a $5,000 drone
No ballllzzzz, what is my 300 billion a year going for if not to support imperialistic resource extractions
Well how else are the billionaires going to keep getting richer?
Lol so much winning.
I like to remind people that the Vietnam war with America and the Ukraine war with Russians are examples where the outside forces did not want to be there.
And the result has been the same: a bunch of dead outsiders who were either killed by war with the locals, or fragged by their own troops.
The use of interceptor missiles will be more expensive than the cargo of the ships being escorted.
The escorts would need to use interceptors to defend the cargo ships. No matter what they do it would be expensive.
As for the ship shortage Trump just cancelled most of the replacement ships that were under design. Oops
Is this epic fury?
"Risk of attack is too great..."
Ah...so the US Navy operates off the same playbook as the Uvalde police department, I see.
Like Bitch, you're a warship. It's literally your job to put yourself at risk during a conflict.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.