482
I'm watching you (programming.dev)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Auster@thebrainbin.org 135 points 1 month ago

says linux is bad but uses the world-wide web 🤭

[-] ramasses@social.ozymandias.club 63 points 1 month ago

says linux is bad but uses a microwave

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Says Linux is bad but uses toaster.

[-] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago

Says Linux is bad but uses a toaster without a license

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Linux is superior, i am in full control and free to use my device however”

has an iphone

[-] Damage@feddit.it 7 points 1 month ago

I've never owned an iPhone, but it's not like Android is the land of freedom

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

It's not like there are actual Linux alternatives on the phone market

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who says linux is bad? At worst people say it's too hard for them to use at home, but i never heard someone say it's bad.

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 44 points 1 month ago

I’ve heard people make the argument that Linux is bad because it’s too hard to use.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

First inpressions matter. The thing most people want operating systems to do is get out of the way. And while using Linux is great (so long as your software supports it), setting it up is not seamless. If you want to install Linux, new users have to spend 8 hours surfing 20 boards to be told 30 different answers about which distro to use. And that's before you even get started.

If you want to install Windows, you just fucking install Windows.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago

Typical Linux distributions are almost objectively harder to use than Android. I'd be surprised if anyone really disagrees with this. When someone complains about Linux being hard to use, it's the POSIX-based Linux distributions that must support arbitrary hardware (often poorly so) that they refer to. I don't need to care about installing NVidia drivers and whether they're compatible with EFI handover when I buy an Android phone.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago

Typical Linux distributions are almost objectively harder to use than Android

So are Windows and macOS.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Sorry I don't follow your point.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago

I think they meant that the comparison should be between desktop OSes.

The fact that the meme mentions desktop and phone OSes is probably because one is likely to use both.

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You do need to worry about whether or not your phone is locked to a specific carrier and if its the carrier you want to use the phone with. or, if its a phone you want to bring to another network, you have to figure our if you need to argue with your current carrier to get it unlocked.

To piggyback off this, Windows is also "harder" than Android. You need to reinstall Windows due to an update fuckup? You tried building your own PC? Well, you either fork.over $120 for an installation media, or you have to create your own, then learn how to boot into the BIOS to boot from that media, then you need to scour the internet for not only your Nvidia driver, but your audio driver, WiFi driver, integrated graphics driver (if you have and want to use an IGPU) and possibly motherboard drivers if your mobo has some odd implementation that requires a driver for USB 3.1 to work properly.

None of these operating systems are "harder" than another. You are just used to one over the other. You don't use your automatic transmission car skills trying to drive a manual transmission, unless your goal is to crash and burn.

[-] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 5 points 1 month ago

You do need to worry about whether or not your phone is locked to a specific carrier and if its the carrier you want to use the phone with

Laughs in Canadian

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] funkajunk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Usually people who installed it yesterday and are mad it doesn’t behave exactly like the OS they’ve been using for the last 20 years (which they also had to learn how to use)

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's not that Linux is bad, it's the fans of it that are annoying

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Apparently, non-cats.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 32 points 1 month ago

Android is hardly linux and is also bad.

[-] variablenine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't say it's bad per se, but getting worse. If they go through with their app developer verification thing then it will definitively cross the threshold from "thin fucking ice" to shit

[-] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago

Android is frustrating with the way it limits you from doing what you want within the os.

[-] wer2@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

But Android is a Linux... Not GNU/Linux, but neither is Alpine.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 15 points 1 month ago

And OSX is a BSD but nobody i ntheir right mind would consider it a BSD distro.

[-] blujan@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

OSX is UNIX, built on BSD foundations but not BSD.

Android on the other hand IS Linux, and is distributed. So I say, it's a Linux distribution.

All other things that people mention as qualifying for a Linux distro are either GNU libs (which alpine doesn't have) or POSIX/UNIX way of doing things, which would disqualify Android from being POSIX compliant but not from being a Linux distro.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago

I'm gonna be real here I don't care.

[-] blujan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

Understandable, have a good day!

[-] pewpew@feddit.it 28 points 1 month ago

Android has to be the worst version of Linux there is

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 8 points 1 month ago

It's so fucking bad. It's actually worse than Windows.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] DeepSeaString@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I would assume because windows you can work your way through things and disable all the bad stuff. Android on the other hand is becoming more restrictive every year and you can do much about it

[-] blinfabian@feddit.nl 22 points 1 month ago

linux sucks because i was promsed a cute penguin but instead got some blue triangle????

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You got a blue triangle?

I got a blue butthole

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

No one wants a frozen butthole

[-] SatyrSack@quokk.au 10 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Man I have to settle for a purple thing with a hole in it, I don't even know what it is

[-] ulterno@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Linux is bad", because it doesn't provide have data collection and transfer to shady corporations with large PR umbrellas, out of the box.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Says won't use anything made by Linus Torvalds. Uses Git.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Linux is BAD - Best Android Dependency.

[-] anitarobs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I like the meaning of BAD, Best Android Dependency. 🥰 That's awesome 😎

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
482 points (91.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

31092 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS