21
submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/longreads@sh.itjust.works

This article does not seek a “better” method. Instead, it argues that the law often mistakes sanitization for progress. Modern execution methods do not resolve the issue of cruelty. They only manage its appearance.

As societies experiment with new forms of executing people, the deeper constitutional problem is not only that an execution method may inflict severe pain. It is that the law’s comparative framework can treat cleaner presentation as improvement even when the State has merely repackaged terror, bodily distress, and coercive violence in more technical form.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Side note; I think it's a bad idea for the state to set an example to citizens: "Murder is okay if you have a good reason."

[-] Tehdastehdas@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago

Meanwhile in China: "Call someone else to do it with their mobile equipment - so tidy."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van

Earlier in Germany and Soviet Union: "We are moving this patient to a better facility."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_van

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

"These changes may not erase cruelty, but simply alter how it is performed, narrated, and justified. Modern execution methods do not abolish cruelty. They teach the eye not to see it."

This is wrong. Killing someone is cruel even if you could do it painlessly. It is not justice, it is revenge and produces nothing other than more murderers.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Excellent Reads

2798 readers
30 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.
  3. Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Other comms that might be of interest:

  1. !boardgames@sopuli.xyz
  2. !norway@sopuli.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS