So if you are a passing trans woman you either:
A. Risk retribution from the law and use the women's bathroom.
Or
B. Follow the law and get called out for being a women in the men's bathroom.
This law really just criminalizes using the bathroom if you are not 100% heteronormative.
Might as well just go back to poodle skirts and khakis.
It's times like this I'm glad we've cured cancer and achieved world piece or this would be an insane development.
And who is checking? Seriously. Is there a guard at the door demanding entrants flash their genitals? And if they’ve already undergone surgery, what then?
This smells more like a don’t ask and don’t you ever fucking tell, or else, push.
The point is to make trans people scared, and most likely, give excuses to incarcerate trans people when they find them.
Logic and proper enforcement does not play any part of these bills
It’ll be volunteer checkers, we have no shortage of them here. They’ll use it to harass anyone who doesn’t meet their expectations, which also means that cisgender women who aren’t conventionally “attractive” and effeminate but cis gay men can be hounded as well. It’s all their favorite victims in one and they can avoid consequences for false reporting by pretending like they did so in good faith. Interestingly, the Idaho police lobbies spoke out against this legislation because even they could see that it’s so aggressive and so difficult to gather evidence they didn’t want to deal with it. Shocking, I know.
Meh the golden excuse still works...
But none of the others apply as broadly to private businesses as the Idaho bill, which covers any “place of public accommodation,” meaning any business or facility that serves the public. The legislation includes nine exceptions for situations like performing janitorial work, responding to emergencies, helping children or cases when someone has “dire need” of a restroom.
As long as you say "I really gotta poop" you can go into any bathroom you want.
Gotta tell you, as a man man, beard n all, I have used the women's bathroom a few times in "I'm gonna literally piss myself" moments. The absolute most reaction I have gotten beyond an eyebrow raise was a laugh at my "sorry, emergency I promise I'll sit!" when a woman and myself made eye contact. I live multiple hours from the capital and probably two from the closest "major" city that Joe Blow Nowhere would recognize.
I really do think the average American doesn't give a shit as long as you're doing your business and getting out. Maybe I've just had good luck.
The biggest, hairiest trans men need to start pinching off loaves in the women's bathroom, preferably in groups of 4 or 5. See how long this law lasts.
New bathroom meta: Individual single toilet and sink bathrooms. Just number them instead of labelling them. Can't have a gender problem if there isn't a gendered common to begin with.
If I was a business owner in Idaho (or any of these states where the law makers are obsessed with people’s genitalia), I’d have a nice bathroom for anyone of any gender, and a squalid closet with a hole in the ground for anyone that voted for this.
Everyone knows there’s only two genders: reasonable people and dipshits
How hard is it to just have single-occupancy "family/handicap" washrooms? They're just better for everyone
It's a little more expensive, but for anyone who actually cares about people, that's what they're doing. Individual toilets, shared sinks.
Like, i think the most expensive thing is getting sucked into any of this culture war bullshit or some weird legal case.
I dont get hiw it costs more to build single occupant washrooms (all you need is like 2) vs building 2 multis + a "family/handicap" one anyway. If anything, it probably saves money and has less traffic since there would be less overall people able to peruse the facillitues unless they want to wait in line
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.