190
Straight to jail. (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago
[-] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 36 points 3 weeks ago

Author here, I don't give a fuck, as long as the book was bought/is read. Stop fetishizing books or start fucking them. 

I do wonder why this person wouldn't just use a e-ink reader, though.

[-] Decq@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I feel like there is a lack of understanding how or what about e-ink. My partner only grasped the concept that it's not an emmisive display after the 5th time explaining. And some friends still don't seem to understand the difference between an e-reader and tablet. (they are extremely tech-illiterate)

If I extrapolate this, there have to be a lot of people who don't want an e-reader because 'they don't want to look at a screen'.

[-] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well, let them read on paper, then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

My kids both prefer paper books to e-readers.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't care about your children but good for them, I guess. It's never about the medium, it's about the content, so if you like to read on screens, paper, cut books or toilet paper, it doesn't matter. Only the content matters. Audiobooks are okay too.

[-] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Your brain works differently listening to audiobooks than reading. So it's not necessarily a substitute, in that you may not get the same out of the text.

Having said that, my wife is a bit ADHD and struggles to read books, but is addicted to audiobooks. 😅

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] pianoplant@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Clearly this is someone who actually reads their books. Given that they are mass market paperbacks... I have no problem with this. If I were an author I would much rather someone does this to my work and actually reads it and enjoys it to someone keeping a pristine copy unopened on their shelf forever.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

infinite jest is half footnotes, which are at the back of the book, which is part of the "joke" of the book, being based around extreme academia.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, sure. The inane pretentiousness was just a "joke"!

Fuck that book.

[-] meekah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago

I mean I know nothing about this book besides what I've read about it in these two comments, but it is called infinite jest, why is it so hard to believe that it's a joke?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

There's no objective reason that this is wrong, but still, take that shit far far away from me

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 22 points 3 weeks ago

Doesn't it fuck up the binding? Sure, a softback is still going to stay together in the immediate term, but the covers are almost always a single stronger piece, whereas the pages will now be free to work loose from the cut side.

So... I'd say it is objectively worse.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 21 points 3 weeks ago

You should cut diagonally. If it makes a sandwich better, imagine what it can do for a novel.

[-] Dry_Monk@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

"yeah, I just finished Infinite. It was pretty good, abrupt ending though. I hear Jest picks up right where it left off."

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Skip jail. Straight to a firing squad of librarians.

[-] Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago

As someone who would never, ever do this to one of my beloved collection: Go for it. Watever keeps you enjoying them. As others have said, we're not talking hundred year old first edition hardcovers here. You can still tape them up and pass them on, unlike those philistines who take one on a hike and rip out the pages they've read to use for campfire tinder.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

In all honesty, in no way sarcastically, I consider this a war crime.

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's a mass-produced book, and a paperback at that. You can certainly keep any such book in good condition to archive or re-read on your own terms. But that stack of acid-paper and cheap glue is going to eventually self-destruct. Unless it's a limited production run, in danger of getting burned, autographed, is an actual collectable, or something else that makes it distinct or valuable, I say: go for it.

Source: I own a stack of these from back in the day. Despite my best efforts to store them appropriately, they're all slowly rotting away. Some things just aren't meant to last.

[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

When you get right down to it, that's true for everything. Everything self-destructs eventually. So, that seems like a strange reason to destroy it prematurely.

Of course, if it's your book, you can do whatever you want with it. It just seems needlessly wasteful.

[-] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Well... Because it's not wasteful at all. The point is to make it easier to read. As long as you're not rough with it, all the pages should stay in, and then you can put both halves back on the shelf when you're done (or just recycle it, since paper is one of the few things that's actually recyclable). Nothing is being destroyed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Overspark@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago

That's just wrong. If you're worried about portability get an e-reader, don't butcher up works of art.

[-] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think most e-readers will stop working if you cut them in half to be more portable. Books still have the upper hand on this

[-] valkyre09@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Plus you can start a fire with them when you’re done, try to start a fire with an e-reader you gonna get one hell of a surprise

[-] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

They also can start a fire, but only once. While every chapter of a book can light a fire.
Another victory for books

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 4 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, if you had like a hand bound copy or rare out of print book or something like that this sentiment makes sense, but if it's just some abundant mass produced edition, I'm not so sure. Surely the artistry there is in the words, which aren't damaged and exist in other copies anyway, rather than the cheap machine made physical medium.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

No works of art were hurt for this. Mass printed paperback spines being damaged doesn’t hurt the words inside or the hundreds of thousands of other copies. Everyone should feel free to write on, highlight, and cut apart mass printed books, because the actual object itself was never the point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 9 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know, I'm a priest and I once sliced up a Bible for personal use.

Tthere was once a particular version of the Bible that I wanted, but the publisher only made a hard-backed version. I hate hard-back books (especially Bibles). So I bought it and immediately sliced the cover off and made a new one out of old church bulletins and duct tape.

[-] Damaskox@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Feels like a quite awful thing to do 😅

[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

The LitBros will hunt this man for sport because of what he did to Infinite Jest.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

I cut mine cross-wise to save space. There is a lot of authors who make no sense.

[-] darkmogool@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

Get the pitchforks!

[-] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

this is so wrong.

you're supposed to cut them in half so you can fit each side in the pockets of your cargo shorts.

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's why I cut mine in half through the middle of the cover; top and bottom halves. Sure, makes it a little harder to read, but worth it when I can fit each half in my pockets perfectly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

The vast majority of books made in something like the last 50+ years are all very low quality and degrade rapidly anyway.

[-] Naich@piefed.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That psychopath needs reporting to the police.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I know a woman that cut her textbooks in college to make them less heavy to carry. She is unique.

[-] drath@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Looking at this awakened the memories of back pain from lugging all those fucking textbooks around when I was in school. God, why were they not split into a dozen parts like this? Do kids still carry them these days?

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I have never been so offended by something so harmless in the greater scheme of things.

[-] zenzanzoo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Release the hounds!

last year I've allowed myself to do marginalia, to allow me to write notes and whatever I want on the books I read while I read. it's inherently destructive, but it changes the whole experience. reading is no longer a passive activity but a conversation with the material. and I love it.

but felt guilty about doing irreversible changes to the book. then this shit shows up.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Almost all of my books are thrifted, which gives me the luxury of no guilt. And I get to argue with previous marginalia, which is fun because they can’t respond.

This is kinda how books worked throughout most of medieval history. Paper was expensive and anyway, the margins often become teaching tools in and of themselves. It becomes a centuries long comment section, so ideas get passed down and develop through the centuries. Like one of the most important books of medieval philosophy that probably no one without a doctoral in theology gives a shit about is Peter Lombard’s Sentences which is just a collection of common comments people in about books that he thought were good for teaching. (I have been working on implementing a HTML cross reference version of it using Twine, and have been trying to parse [pun intended] a theological discussion about what it means to enjoy not use god. Larger project is to recreate an accessible “medieval curriculum” through Twine)

As much as I’d fantasize about all my books preserved as a library, they’ll probably be separated from each other someday. The least I can do is put my soul in them - tuck a pamphlet or bookmark, a movie ticket. I’ve never been unhappy seeing a comment in a book - I was reading a 60 year old middle school text recently, and discovered a kid had wrote “[clearly female name] is a MAGGOT F_GGOT!!!!!!” which was just so fucking hilarious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Before seeing this i thought i was anti death penalty.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
190 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11394 readers
224 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS