I'm utterly beside myself. RADIOHEAD VERSUS RADIOHEAD FOR THE FINALS? This just has to be ragebait. I guess a lot of Pitchfork is just ragebait. (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by mistermodal@lemmy.ml to c/music@lemmy.ml

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://xcancel.com/pitchfork/status/2042340515874795993#m

There is a lot going on here. You're not surprised to see Kendrick Lamar are you? Yeah I didn't think so. Actually makes me physically angry thinking about how they could be boosting rare music with this

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] flux@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You should really post how this was evaluated. Only albums from the last 30 years and votes come from pitchfork Instagram stories polls. After knowing that I'm not surprised at all. This is all just clickbait for Pitchfork. A better discussion would be the albums they started with and if they should even be here.

[-] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Radiohead aged really badly

[-] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No Toxicity? No Slim Shady? No Chronic 2001? But Whole Lotta Red????

WTF is this list?

EDIT: WHERE IS BATTLE FOR LOS ANGELES???

[-] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

We will boil them soon

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026

11 points (100.0% liked)

Music

4341 readers

3 users here now

A community to share the music worth sharing.

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

123@lemmy.ml