1208
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lenny@lemmy.zip 142 points 1 month ago

I’ve never been legally accused of eating an entire sleeve of Oreos at 3 in the morning last night.

[-] deacon@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago
[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 month ago
[-] deacon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Oh my no. It’s mandatory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] recentSlinky@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

So brave :')

[-] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Thin mints.... well ive never denied it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Wow only one sleeve? I can't keep oreos around because I'll eat a whole family size container in one sitting.

[-] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't worry, shrinkflation can somewhat absolve your gluttony because today's "family size" oreos are the same size as normal packages used to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 100 points 1 month ago

Neither have I, lady, but you don't hear me holding press conferences about it.

[-] Klox@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago

I'm thinking someone should legally accuse her.

[-] Draegur@piefed.social 76 points 1 month ago

Have never been legally accused or convicted SO FAR...!
83VdHD3qSB1Oabd.jpg

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"No member of my immediate faimily has never been formally accused^1 of the sex crimes my husband has been covering up."

^1 statement does not include civil judgments holding my husband liable for sexual assault

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

I wonder what she knows that hasn't been made public yet. She's clearly trying to get out in front of something.

[-] Microw@piefed.zip 27 points 1 month ago

Apparently she is in a legal battle against Michael Wolff who claimed that Epstein was the one who originally introduced Melania and Trump to each other

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 40 points 1 month ago

We have a strange suspicion that she was secretly trying to remind everybody that the Epstein Files are still a problem.

[-] TachyonTele@piefed.social 23 points 1 month ago

That would mean she's not a scumbag.
But she is one.

[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Not it doesn't. It means she wants her disgusting anchor hubby to stroke out so she can fade into obscurity with billions of stolen dollars.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 15 points 1 month ago

She could be doing it to hurt her idiot husband. Her motivations don't have to be good. People (inadvertantly) do good things for bad reasons all the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 0x0@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago

No she could definitely still be a scumbag

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Oddly precise wording. She could have chosen more blanket language and she didnt. She might just as well have held a press conference and admitted she is guilty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

Up until today I’d just assumed without thinking about it that she wasn’t involved in any of the scummier Epstein dealings, but she’s just done a good job of making me question that.

[-] M137@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

She's in the files and theres both proof and unproven things said that puts her right in the deep end with them all, she's just as bad as them.

Did all of the competent PR people quit? Or were they fired for not getting the required Mar A Lago face surgery?

[-] rbn@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago

I assume that Trump never paid their bills, as he did with his laywers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They were probably fired becuse the Trumps thought they can do a better job. Just like Musks.

We have a saying here, "Hochmut kommt vor dem Fall" or the bible:

„Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.“ (Proverbs: 16,18, KJV)

[-] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Nah the bad guys just don't care anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 24 points 1 month ago

first ESCORT assigned by putin to be specific

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I know I've seen lots of pictures of the Trumps with Epstein and Maxwell, and I know I've seen emails between Melania and others indicating that they were at least friends who hung out.

What I haven't seen is evidence that Melania was party to the pedo stuff. I assume she WAS party to it, because her own life story screams "sex trafficked, but at a higher class of trafficking," but i would like to understand KNOWN FACTS about her role in this. Is there a good article somewhere about her part here?

I ask because there is a scenario where her husband is good/close friends with Epstein, and Melania is playing the role of the Important Man's Wife by making insincere, surface friendships with the friends' wives.

Kind of like mob wives might clique up, even if they don't actually like each other or enjoy the company, if that makes sense.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Melania is a piece of shit, fuck her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've never been legally accused or convicted of speeding at or above 10 mph over the posted speed limit in the state of Kansas

She either hates her dipshit husband or is the srcond dumbest pedophile on the planet.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

she definitely does hate him, only staying with him because he has BILLIONS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

First, epstein island to distract from the thing.

Second war to distract from epstein island.

Third we're back to epstein island again.

Fourth, coliseum gladiator fight between nepotism babies on Crack (hunter Biden vs trump sons).

Lolz.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 14 points 1 month ago

$50 on Hunter, those trump babies look like you could snap 'em over your knee

[-] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

Hunters done a lot of drugs in his life...his cardiovascular health cant be that strong.

But God knows what drugs the Trump kids have done.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Oyml77@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago

I'll bet this is something the founding fathers never saw coming, a thing 45 previous first ladies have never gone before the country to say.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] hateisreality@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

.....So far

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

she said convinced, btw, not convicted.

convinced of a crime.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

WE DRAW THE LINE AT EMBEZZLING FROM CHILDRENS CANCER CHARITIES!

[-] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

She forgot « yet » at the end there

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 month ago

We need to write a sawng about how we don't diddle kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I've been thinking about this meme the whole day, but I couldn't bring myself to do it.... i shouldn't,. nah I couldn't ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I finally know where I have heard that accent before.

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The paper she was reading from (which I strongly suspect was written by someone else) said "convicted", but she said "convinced".

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
1208 points (99.4% liked)

simpsonsshitposting

5335 readers
78 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS