-7
submitted 11 hours ago by lautan@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] T0RB1T@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Sponsored by an AI company, sorry, can't trust someone with such poor judgement.

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Hard disagree. That was a delightful accurate, sober, honest and concise assessment of where we are.

Your bias, however warranted against AI, is throwing the baby out with the bath water.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

The ad-sponsor description is silly, but Boyle is a decent character and this is fine and thought provoking. He goes from a financial perspective so sure I don't agree with him but he brings sound arguments.

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

I am usually skeptical about you tubers, but this one was good. Clear thinking right on the spot.

One observation that surfaces from this video and has merit for Canadians to watch as policymakers decide what to do about the obvious unsustainable nature of the Canadian housing market:

Problem: the housing ladder has been pulled up and Canada's youth effectively can't access it. How can aging Canadians' housing assets maintain that value if future generations can't support its value?

Solution 1: Restoration - Policy supports gently rebalance to where housing declines eventually catch up to a reinvigored youth workforce and the population has a continuum of property succession. I.e. we lower the property ladder back to within reach.

Solution 2: Acceleration - We continue the disastrous path of the last 25 years and continue down the path of financialization of housing. Pension Funds, REITs, Hedge Funds end everyone between large corporate players to wealthy mom and pop investors will consolidate housing forever. I.e. The property ladder is burned forever.

Where things get interesting, is considering the global demographic decline of aging populations, both options aren't far away from a major reckoning in absolute terms. #2, in my personal opinion is the more vulnerable. Holding onto declining housing asset and rental prices inside a demographic collapse is going to hot-potato hard. We would see a period of crushing rentierism, tearing the social fabric of the country resulting in severe withdrawl symptoms when such egregious malinvestments reveal their consequences.

Edit: spelling and clarity.

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
-7 points (36.0% liked)

Canada

11865 readers
651 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS