307
submitted 3 days ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/mop@quokk.au
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

(In case juries are watching) It could be AI though

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 159 points 3 days ago

First we had Luigi.

Now we have Warehouse Luigi, a Waluigi, if you will.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Whole new meaning to NSFW. Never Safe From Waluigi!

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Now Set Fire, Waaahh!

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 107 points 3 days ago

New union tactic: start openly organizing, and threaten to burn the building down if they try to union bust

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately both them (and us) forgot that this is the kind of thing their new deal tried to prevent. We didn't get 8 hour days and 5 day weeks because we asked nicely and they felt generous. We got it because workers back then burnt down shit and the bosses were at a reasonable fear they were gonna get got.

We need to put the fear back into the rich again if we need to see real change.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 103 points 3 days ago

Wait, that's just the old tactics

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

The state wanted to remove the rules. They didn't know the rules were there to keep them safe from us.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

That's not a new union tactic, that's an old school union tactic. Organisation and unions started with riots and breaking shit.

[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 11 points 2 days ago

Really heartwarming to see us go back to our roots. I honestly thought the system had managed to breed it out of us.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Once we are done we can go to the executives' homes too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 94 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Who would win?

One disgruntled boi with a lighter

or

A billion dollar company

Where's my stapler?

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

One? There are millions of us for every single one of them.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago

I… uh… unfortunately, I’m gonna go with the billion dollar company.

Insurance will cover most of the damage, the dude will end up in prison, and at most the worst that the company will suffer is higher premiums.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

The higher premiums will cost the company almost as much as the arson. Insurance just spreads out financial risk over time; it's still a net loss for the insured.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

I am hoping insurance will do all it can to deny and even then charge more moving forward.

Alternatively, the company heads will get scared knowing their house is flammable too.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago

As much as I support the dude's sentiments, I gotta go with the billion dollar company winning on this one. He's not getting paid, likely facing prison time, fines, and legal fees, and the billion dollar company files an insurance claim.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 38 points 3 days ago

As a singular instance, sure. But if people become inspired to organize to continue these actions across multiple industries, then we begin to destabilize the system.

He struck a blow, and showed people it is possible to fight back. That's a win in my book, regardless of the price he had to pay to achieve it.

[-] johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I wonder if these kind of things become common enough would insurance companies start charging business higher premiums based on average employees wages because a poor employee is more liable to snap and burn the place down.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

They can call it the “asshole tax”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

He did not receive a piece of cake.

[-] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

I'm glad nobody was hurt, he waited until after midnight to set it. But maybe someone needs to call the fire marshals on the Kimberly Clark warehouses. I can hear a fire alarm at the end, and I'm no fire safety engineer, but it doesn't look like there are signs of sprinklers or other fire suppression systems?

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 79 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Don't have the full article but there was fire suppression. Then the fire team showed up, evacuated the building, and, at the behest of the company, shut off the system to prevent further damage to the rest of the products as the fire team was handling the original fire.

Then the dude went around and started burning other pallets in different parts of the warehouse.

Waluigi here had a plan and executed it.

Should have paid them enough to live.

[-] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago

Oh, that's very interesting. If that's true, someone should tell Kimberly-Clark's insurers that they deliberately shut off fire suppression during a fire. Maybe this will actually cost them a few dollars?

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago

lol I didn't even think of this, hilarious

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 2 days ago

It's standard practice to shut down a fire suppression system after the fire is extinguished: the water will cause more damage than the fire did if you don't. The owner is responsible for having someone on "fire watch" until the activated sprinkler heads are replaced and the system is put back into service -- which needs to be done by someone qualified to do so.

It sounds like they did everything "right" in that regard, they just didn't realize the guy starting fires was still there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Funny enough even in fox news apparently people are calling it a fire insurance scam.

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Damn bro wasn't fucking around

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I approve of this message! 👍

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
307 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1513 readers
1587 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS