309
submitted 2 weeks ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/mop@quokk.au
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 160 points 2 weeks ago

First we had Luigi.

Now we have Warehouse Luigi, a Waluigi, if you will.

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Whole new meaning to NSFW. Never Safe From Waluigi!

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

Now Set Fire, Waaahh!

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 108 points 2 weeks ago

New union tactic: start openly organizing, and threaten to burn the building down if they try to union bust

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 104 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, that's just the old tactics

[-] GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago

The state wanted to remove the rules. They didn't know the rules were there to keep them safe from us.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 weeks ago

Unfortunately both them (and us) forgot that this is the kind of thing their new deal tried to prevent. We didn't get 8 hour days and 5 day weeks because we asked nicely and they felt generous. We got it because workers back then burnt down shit and the bosses were at a reasonable fear they were gonna get got.

We need to put the fear back into the rich again if we need to see real change.

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

That's not a new union tactic, that's an old school union tactic. Organisation and unions started with riots and breaking shit.

[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 11 points 2 weeks ago

Really heartwarming to see us go back to our roots. I honestly thought the system had managed to breed it out of us.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Once we are done we can go to the executives' homes too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 95 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Who would win?

One disgruntled boi with a lighter

or

A billion dollar company

Where's my stapler?

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 weeks ago

As much as I support the dude's sentiments, I gotta go with the billion dollar company winning on this one. He's not getting paid, likely facing prison time, fines, and legal fees, and the billion dollar company files an insurance claim.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 weeks ago

As a singular instance, sure. But if people become inspired to organize to continue these actions across multiple industries, then we begin to destabilize the system.

He struck a blow, and showed people it is possible to fight back. That's a win in my book, regardless of the price he had to pay to achieve it.

[-] johnyreeferseed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I wonder if these kind of things become common enough would insurance companies start charging business higher premiums based on average employees wages because a poor employee is more liable to snap and burn the place down.

[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

They can call it the “asshole tax”.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

I… uh… unfortunately, I’m gonna go with the billion dollar company.

Insurance will cover most of the damage, the dude will end up in prison, and at most the worst that the company will suffer is higher premiums.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

I am hoping insurance will do all it can to deny and even then charge more moving forward.

Alternatively, the company heads will get scared knowing their house is flammable too.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Personally I’d never want to burn down someone’s house. If I found out afterwards they had a pet, I’d have something to feel bad about.

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

I have seen this repeatedly, and while I understand that it would be sad, what is more valuable: 1-3 pets, or all the humans that will have their lives destroyed by the fuck you set fire to?

Did you forget why we were here? Liberation isn't free. Dead animals are very sad. I get it. A dead ecosystem includes many dead animals. Like, MANY.

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

This is a concept that a lot of people struggle with. They lose sight of the bigger picture and simply react to what's right in front of them.

This is why having class consciousness is important. It puts everything into perspective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

Kidnap their pet first and then you get a free companion alongside destroying the rulers

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

The higher premiums will cost the company almost as much as the arson. Insurance just spreads out financial risk over time; it's still a net loss for the insured.

The message is just as important.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

He did not receive a piece of cake.

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

One? There are millions of us for every single one of them.

[-] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

I'm glad nobody was hurt, he waited until after midnight to set it. But maybe someone needs to call the fire marshals on the Kimberly Clark warehouses. I can hear a fire alarm at the end, and I'm no fire safety engineer, but it doesn't look like there are signs of sprinklers or other fire suppression systems?

[-] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 80 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Don't have the full article but there was fire suppression. Then the fire team showed up, evacuated the building, and, at the behest of the company, shut off the system to prevent further damage to the rest of the products as the fire team was handling the original fire.

Then the dude went around and started burning other pallets in different parts of the warehouse.

Waluigi here had a plan and executed it.

Should have paid them enough to live.

[-] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, that's very interesting. If that's true, someone should tell Kimberly-Clark's insurers that they deliberately shut off fire suppression during a fire. Maybe this will actually cost them a few dollars?

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

lol I didn't even think of this, hilarious

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

Damn bro wasn't fucking around

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Funny enough even in fox news apparently people are calling it a fire insurance scam.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

I am very curious about the circumstances leading up to this

And I’m very curious how long his court case will take.

[-] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

I am very curious about the circumstances leading up to this

Simple, they didn't pay them enough to live

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Matty_r@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

Anyone got some more context for this please? (Apart from the obvious)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
309 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1568 readers
457 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS