First we had Luigi.
Now we have Warehouse Luigi, a Waluigi, if you will.
First we had Luigi.
Now we have Warehouse Luigi, a Waluigi, if you will.
Whole new meaning to NSFW. Never Safe From Waluigi!
Now Set Fire, Waaahh!
New union tactic: start openly organizing, and threaten to burn the building down if they try to union bust
Wait, that's just the old tactics
The state wanted to remove the rules. They didn't know the rules were there to keep them safe from us.
Unfortunately both them (and us) forgot that this is the kind of thing their new deal tried to prevent. We didn't get 8 hour days and 5 day weeks because we asked nicely and they felt generous. We got it because workers back then burnt down shit and the bosses were at a reasonable fear they were gonna get got.
We need to put the fear back into the rich again if we need to see real change.
That's not a new union tactic, that's an old school union tactic. Organisation and unions started with riots and breaking shit.
Really heartwarming to see us go back to our roots. I honestly thought the system had managed to breed it out of us.
Once we are done we can go to the executives' homes too.
Who would win?
One disgruntled boi with a lighter
or
A billion dollar company
Where's my stapler?
As much as I support the dude's sentiments, I gotta go with the billion dollar company winning on this one. He's not getting paid, likely facing prison time, fines, and legal fees, and the billion dollar company files an insurance claim.
As a singular instance, sure. But if people become inspired to organize to continue these actions across multiple industries, then we begin to destabilize the system.
He struck a blow, and showed people it is possible to fight back. That's a win in my book, regardless of the price he had to pay to achieve it.
I wonder if these kind of things become common enough would insurance companies start charging business higher premiums based on average employees wages because a poor employee is more liable to snap and burn the place down.
They can call it the “asshole tax”.
I… uh… unfortunately, I’m gonna go with the billion dollar company.
Insurance will cover most of the damage, the dude will end up in prison, and at most the worst that the company will suffer is higher premiums.
I am hoping insurance will do all it can to deny and even then charge more moving forward.
Alternatively, the company heads will get scared knowing their house is flammable too.
Personally I’d never want to burn down someone’s house. If I found out afterwards they had a pet, I’d have something to feel bad about.
I have seen this repeatedly, and while I understand that it would be sad, what is more valuable: 1-3 pets, or all the humans that will have their lives destroyed by the fuck you set fire to?
Did you forget why we were here? Liberation isn't free. Dead animals are very sad. I get it. A dead ecosystem includes many dead animals. Like, MANY.
This is a concept that a lot of people struggle with. They lose sight of the bigger picture and simply react to what's right in front of them.
This is why having class consciousness is important. It puts everything into perspective.
Kidnap their pet first and then you get a free companion alongside destroying the rulers
The higher premiums will cost the company almost as much as the arson. Insurance just spreads out financial risk over time; it's still a net loss for the insured.
The message is just as important.
He did not receive a piece of cake.
One? There are millions of us for every single one of them.
I'm glad nobody was hurt, he waited until after midnight to set it. But maybe someone needs to call the fire marshals on the Kimberly Clark warehouses. I can hear a fire alarm at the end, and I'm no fire safety engineer, but it doesn't look like there are signs of sprinklers or other fire suppression systems?
Don't have the full article but there was fire suppression. Then the fire team showed up, evacuated the building, and, at the behest of the company, shut off the system to prevent further damage to the rest of the products as the fire team was handling the original fire.
Then the dude went around and started burning other pallets in different parts of the warehouse.
Waluigi here had a plan and executed it.
Should have paid them enough to live.
Oh, that's very interesting. If that's true, someone should tell Kimberly-Clark's insurers that they deliberately shut off fire suppression during a fire. Maybe this will actually cost them a few dollars?
lol I didn't even think of this, hilarious
Damn bro wasn't fucking around
Funny enough even in fox news apparently people are calling it a fire insurance scam.
I am very curious about the circumstances leading up to this
And I’m very curious how long his court case will take.
I am very curious about the circumstances leading up to this
Simple, they didn't pay them enough to live
Anyone got some more context for this please? (Apart from the obvious)
Seize the Memes of Production
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities: