The first [of 3 catalysts], were the deaths of five adult males and one adult female - for reasons unknown - in 2014, which could have disrupted social networks and weakened social ties across the subgroups
They assassinated Archmonke Ferdinand!
They took him out
Literally the only reason I remember this person's name.
If I move, this 👉👉 could die!
I wonder what fascinated alien scientists would write about us
That for all our so-called advances, in the end we're still a lot more like the other apes and other monkeys (for we are both), than we commonly like to perceive.
And Goodall of course already observed this stuff many decades ago (regarding chimps).
Goodall observed it and commented in it, but this group specifically studied the behavior.
Oh, I thought it was more of a breaking-news thing based on recent, ongoing observations? (if not, then that's what I get for not reading the damn article)
I remember not so long ago, the fact being presented that only rats and humans killed for unnecessary reasons. For example, outside of the broad, known idea that species could kill as part of a territorial / protection / etc thing. But based on what Goodall observed, some chimps seemed to have no particular reason to kill some others of their species. It was more of a 'I just don't like you' kind of thing, IIRC.
I don’t know where you saw that fact being presented, but surplus killing has long been documented in many species, including those who don’t make caches for winter.
@JohnnyEnzyme I guess it depends on what you consider 'unnecessary', but I believe this has been observed in MOST species. Dogs and cats do it, for sure, and those are just creatures that many of us can observe a lot.
The fundamental problem with random / unnecessary aggression upon different species, for no real, apparent reason, is that it certainly carries inherent risk. Risk of personal injury and risk of disease introduction is just for starters, and the regular goal of most species is to live and reproduce.
If you understand the very Theory of Evolution, then you'll understand why most animals don't typically take such unnecessary risks. Cost-benefit, and all that, with science and observable, known facts coming foremost.
@JohnnyEnzyme Nevertheless, apparently unnecessary killing does seem common enough in plenty of species.
Not to my knowledge, as a zoophile and someone who's been trying to be curious, for many decades.
Feel free to present your list of science papers and documented, science-encounters you can back up, of course...
And yet, when I tell people that I don't like primates (aside from orangutans), somehow they don't understand why that might be.
I learned about the civil war that Jane Goodall was witness to. I don't look at chimps the same anymore. Orangutans are where it's at.
I realized I hate apes and monkeys.
Then I realize I just hate all primates.
Again? This was well documented by Jane Goodall in her books from 50 years ago.
Sandel and his colleagues said their findings encourage people to rethink what they know of human conflict and warfare.
Not this annoying bullshit every time. I blame this stupid ass establishment needing to justify funding by circling back everything for our convenience. Can we not appreciate nature for what it is for once?
This is mentioned in other articles. There's a difference between documenting an observation of something that you saw versus studying and researching that behavior.
Also, not everything is political.
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
Posts must be:
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!