did you give bravely default a shot?

That's what I was here to post.

"I like FF7 but I wish instead of a JRPG, it was a generic ARPG" said an SE exec at some point, apparently.

I would enjoy the hell out of a Mass Effect themed turn based strategy.

They kind of tried that, but unfortunately it wasn't very good.

We almost had an OTS shooter set in StarCraft's universe... I wonder what life would have been like if Ghost actually came out in 2005. 🤔

Starcraft 2 is super fun as a randomizer in the RTS format, but I do want to see more done with that IP. The problem is, like you, I will never give Blizzard a single penny ever again.

But I want a Kenshi like game set in Morrowind.

Honestly, I'd like a Kenshi-like game set in damn near any setting.

Like, the Kenshi setting is interesting, but in terms of gameplay...it's essentially unique from a gameplay standpoint. I'm still a bit amazed that nobody has made other games in the genre.

There is a sequel that is being worked on and will come out someday...

I would probably damn near never leave the house if that game were to exist.

I hadn't heard of this game somehow, thanks!

Isn't Binding of Isaac by the guy(s) that did Castle Crashers, which got their start on Newgrounds?

I haven't played Isaac, but I've played enough Castle Crashers to know that it's pretty gorey/scatty with all the weird poop "jokes" and whatnot.

I feel the same way about CC as you do about Isaac. It's fun to play, but some of the themes either haven't aged well or were already for a particular audience.

Sunless Sea mentioned! Most of its value is in setting, writing and atmosphere, which are all really well executed. The gameplay was fun enough, but combat is tedious and I tried to avoid it, like you'd do in a horror game. I see it more as a visual novel with some exploration and resource management. Focus on the story, the characters, the locations. Fetch a macguffin only because it makes the story progress or because it makes you go beyond the explored world, not because you're so interested in the act of fetching.

That would be dope. And it's not like they couldn't pull it off either; this is the same dev that gave us Max Payne. Now I am imagining Jesse diving and slowing down time while kicking Hiss ass. 🤣

Did you not adjust the settings of the game to make it cater to what you want?

Yeah, the combat is the least interesting part of the Control universe IMO. It was a shame they went the bullet sponge route with Firebreak. I felt they could have gone the friend-slop route and made a Repo-like set in the oldest house. The weirdness is the fun part, and I think the shooter aspect feels obligatory. AW2 was a better balance I thought. Felt like the game was 1/3 interesting cutscenes and story development, 1/3 exploration, 1/3 combat.

I feel exactly the opposite.

There are plenty of turn-based RPGs and JRPGs that I fell asleep playing that I probably wouldn't have if I didn't have to mostly stare at a static screen and menus most of the game. And dont even get me started on random battles.

Turn-based RPGs have repetitive combat loops to me. Same intro, same enemy lineup, same strategy, same music, same victory jingle. Over and over and over. It least in an action oriented game, I can choose where my character is, how I engage with combat, what terrain features I use, etc.

This is why I like Strategic Turn Based games like Fire Emblem and XCOM way more than standard turn based games.

Turn base probably won't save the shallowness of Witcher 3 combat, it need an overhaul for more in depth system. Witcher is introduced in the first one as a methodological monster hunter where he learn, prepare, and hunt the monster, while also deal with politics(which is probably the strongest part of the series). In Witcher 3 Geralt is a ballerina dancing with his blade.

The best witcher combat is in Monster Hunter World.

I'm the exact opposite, in a different, but similar way that the other commenter is.

I will fall asleep trying to play almost any turn-based/tactical RPG you give me. It's just too slow for me, and I can't focus on stats or stacking effects that much. That's why I like real-time action games. I've been playing the hell out of Fallout 4 lately and that is probably the fastest-paced game out of the entire series. There's snappy gunplay in first- and third-person with a dedicated bash/grenade button, and you can pop out from behind cover when you aim. Also the whole customizing and modification system with the workshop and settlements.

FO4 is not an immersive sim.

could have been a cool turn based JPRG

Yall know that ‘Fallout’ was originally turn-based? No need for anything Japanese in there, the RPG system was pretty good.

The nineties had some cool turn-based tactics games, like the ‘Jagged Alliance’ series, ‘X-Com’, ‘Incubation’. Even realtime tactics were very nice in the isometric view, e.g. in ‘Commandos’. Now that everything needs to be in either first-person or third-person from behind, such games rarely pop up.

"The best part of Fallout is it basically never runs out of content"

That's the worst part. All of those randomly generated filler quests that send you back to a location you've cleared twice before to kill the same named raider npc are at the very core of what is wrong with Fallout 4.

I wish Fallout would return to primarily being a roleplaying game, with actual dialog choices, including the ability to say "No, I don't give a shit about Shaun. In fact, I'm glad he was kidnapped, so that I don't have to be bogged down by a backstory that I never agreed to."

Oh, and it would be nice if the main character wasn't automatically the leader of every faction in the game.

Never really given FO4 a chance, the FPS feel just didn't land right for me. I'm curious though, in what ways does it basically never run out of content? I love being able to play a game for a long time.