133
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus 19 points 1 month ago

also to clarify the body wasn't lying there for a week but a few hours

[-] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Still, if your coworker drops dead next to you, you shouldn't be forced to continue to fucking work.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Sure it's sad that a coworker has just died in front of you, but you know what would be even worse than that?
Letting down the shareholders 😢

[-] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What is that smell?

Oh that's Greg, he died a week ago, but didn't have PTO and can't check out yet

[-] JamieDub86@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

Isnt the problem that they were left at all?

[-] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I don't use Amazon for anything

I have never bought a thing from them

This shit only exists because of people being willing to pay extra, for other people to be exploited, so that they can enjoy some convenience

There was life before all these delivery services. They're not actually necessary

[-] mech@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

Cutting Amazon out of my life has improved my life a lot.
I now buy books from a local shop lead by a huge sci-fi and manga nerd. She's recommended so many great books I never would have found otherwise.
I try to buy as many things as possible locally, but sadly that isn't possible (or wildly worse) anymore.
But when I do buy online, I buy from smaller independent shops specializing on the thing I'm buying.

[-] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

That's the thing:

It's actually really easy

People are lazy and are sadly willing to turn a blind eye to the fact that convenience for them comes at the cost of someone else being exploited

All so Bezos can get even more disgustingly rich

[-] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I agree OP calls it a horror but the truth is most people will accept it as long as convenient parcels still arrive. They didn't know the person and don't care. I was an amazon user but cut it out. I was fallible but changed.

Ask people if they would give up their parcels...most look at me like I am crazy.

[-] dis_da_mor@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 month ago

yipee! corporate tech dystopia sooner!

[-] franzbroetchen@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm from Europe and Amazon is known to have very shitty working conditions here as well. And then I remember there's America where you're not guaranteed to have (paid) sick leave or even fucking PTO -.-

[-] The_Hideous_Orgalorg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In america, you're lucky to get unpaid sick leave instead of just being terminated for not coming in anyway whenever demanded by your owner.

[-] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe they were doing their family a favor by leaving them clocked in.

[-] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Infinite money glitch, only requirements: human sacrifice

Hell yeah

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

It is horrible, but the title is quite misleading.

Person keeled over unlisted reason

Someone started performing CPR

Management refused to let another come over to sub in when person 1 got tired because it needed to be management or the safety team. Presumably, the safety team would be the relief. My guess is risk of letting an untrained employee help was risk. The first person started cpr before management got there or they would have stopped them too.

Management told everyone to get back to work and not to gawk.

Person died

The news that it happened wasn't released for a week.

All brought to the surface by a Senate hearing on the lack of worker safety at Amazon.

So a person died, maybe work-related. The company gives 0 fucks about other workers' emotional state.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Its not misleading, both claims are true. If people refuse to read articles and only read headlines thats not on the author.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

disagree on the last part.

headlines cannot be outright false to their contents, it is acceptable to assume the headline is true to the article

that doesn't change that in this case the headline clearly has two separate claims

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2026
133 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

11924 readers
589 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS