403
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by sparky678348@lemm.ee to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

I don't know what a .webp file is but I don't like it. They're like a filthy prank version of the image/gif you're looking for. They make you jump through all these hoops to find the original versions of the files that you can actually do anything with.

Edit: honestly I assumed it had something to do with Google protecting themselves from image piracy shit

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kabe@lemmy.world 203 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The format actually has a lot of benefits - it supports transparency, animation, and compresses very efficiently. So it could theoretically replace GIF, JPG, and PNG in one fell swoop.

The downsides are that many apps don't currently support it and that it's owned by Google.

Personally I use webp for images that are not intended to share (e.g. banners and images on my blog), but stick to JPG/PNG for sending to other people.

[-] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 141 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

and that it’s owned by Google.

I mean yes, but it's ~~patent~~ irrevocably royalty free (so long as you don't sue people claiming WebM/P as your own/partially your own work), so it's effectively owned by the public.

Google hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer implementations of the WebM Specifications, where such license applies only to those patent claims, both currently owned by Google and acquired in the future, licensable by Google that are necessarily infringed by implementation of the WebM Specifications. If You or your agent or exclusive licensee institute or order or agree to the institution of patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that any implementation of the WebM Specifications constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, or inducement of patent infringement, then any rights granted to You under the License for the WebM Specifications shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. "WebM Specifications" means the specifications to the WebM codecs as embodied in the source code to the WebM codecs or any written description of such specifications, in either case as distributed by Google.

Source: https://www.webmproject.org/license/bitstream/

(But Dark, that's WebM not WebP! -- they share the same license: https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/g/webp-discuss/c/W4_j7Tlofv8)

[-] CheshireSnake@iusearchlinux.fyi 29 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this. I was kind of on the fence because of its ties to google but this helps a ton.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

And here comes jpegXL claiming the same things. Fun times.

[-] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Okay, but jpeg xl is looking pretty good. Especially the ability to losslessly convert jpg to jxl.

Recent conversation on lemmy.world and an article about it.

[-] nulldev@lemmy.vepta.org 20 points 1 year ago

JPEG XL came after WebP. It's more of a successor and less of a competitor.

That said, in the world of standards, a successor is still a competitor.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] Polar@lemmy.ca 124 points 1 year ago

You would like it if you had slow internet, or you hosted a website.

My website turned 5MB images into 100KB images using webp. My website now loads instantly, saves you bandwidth, and me costs!

[-] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Wait really? Are they that much more efficient?

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Yep! Not least of all, GIF & JPEG are over 30 year old formats and WebP is about a decade old. So there's at least 20 years of advancement there

[-] optimal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

JPEG-XL has been out for three years, and is better and more efficient than any other image format on the market. Google just has been insisting on keeping them off the web because they want to push WebP instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrQuint@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You only dislike it because whatever bad app you're using to share them on doesn't support them.

Stop being the gullible fool and start hating the apps not the file format.

Edit: I also spot your .gif favouritism in there. .gif is an archaic and wasteful format, and asking for it is the same as looking at your car and whining that the fuel has no lead.

[-] twistedtxb@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago

The fact that GIF is still a thing in 2023 is baffling

[-] IanM32@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

The terminology is sticking around longer than the format, too! Love me some (webm/H265) gifs.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago

The guy clearly isn't familiar with a lot of image formats and is trying to find out about them by asking, a perfectly reasonable thing to do, and in a special community called no stupid questions, no less.

You don't need to call anyone a gullible fool and furthermore you've not actually helped to answer the question "what is webp", at all. What are you trying to achieve with this pointless aggression? If you wanted one less "gullible fool" you'd have to answer the question and educate, at best you've sown confusion.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] plutolink@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago

this is nostupidquestions, not /g/. take your meds

[-] mawp@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Why's man so vexed about file formats? Chill

[-] Sir_Kevin@discuss.online 39 points 1 year ago

Because GIF is horrible for 90% of what it's used for these days.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

It's just a new picture format that is arguably better than jpeg in many scenarios. It has been around for many years. Windows just refuses to do file associations correctly, so people hate it for no reason.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Webp is an image format.

Jpg is ancient, and gif, holy shit gif is from stone age.

I dunno, if you're playing a video, you probably want x264 or better these days, no? For music, we use some variant of mp4 or lossless at this point.

Yet with pictures, for some reason we insist on the old shitty stuff.

Using jpeg or gif is like using mp1 for music and VideoCD for video. Come on now.

The only problem with webp is that there's quality loss if you convert an already compressed jpeg into webp with high compression rate, like some web sites do. That can suck, but I don't know how else to get people to use more modern formats. Otherwise we'd be using ancient formats into the 24th century.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The old shitty stuff was designed to compress images and stuff to be small enough to transfer on potato internet.

Now the HTML size itself ends up larger than many of the images while they code in endless advertising and scripts.

Old internet was better TBH.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[-] BitchPudding@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's a Firefox extension that adds right-click context menu options to save the webp as PNG or JPEG:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/save-webp-as-png-or-jpeg/
and its GitHub page:
https://github.com/jscher2000/Save-webP-as-extension

Makes it a bit easier than downloading the webp and converting it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Gamey@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

It's a image format with extremely good compression that's tiny doesn't look bad. As someone who had shitty internet for years I definitely welcome them but as usual with Googles inventions they push it on to everyone and let other browsers catch up.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 year ago

Webp is a fairly standard if rather new image format, that are frequently used by websites due to their small file size. To further cut bandwidth costs and loading time, websites will often only include a tiny webp of an image until you click to expand or something like that, so that they don't have to serve a massive image if the user will only even see a thumbnail sized preview. However, this does break the "save image" button as if you try to download the thumbnail, say from google images.

Completely separately, some scummy sites will make you sign up for an account or something to download a full size image, and the only advice I have here is that it is almost always faster to find another site with the image then jump though the hoops.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Just a way for Google to influence and force change on end users away from previously accepted standards, a strategy that allows them to further obfuscate attempts to DRM all media to make sure only authorized parties can play in the sandbox. Don't worry, they're trying to move the entire browser that way as well. Mandatory ads and mandatory DRM that can scan your cache and local files for possible violations are coming right goddamn behind it all.

WEBP is effectively a container format warped into a media compression format, it's strength that's actively exploited is obviously in saving a little bandwidth by (further) compressing and serving smaller sized cached webp files of existing jpg/png/gif/etc files to end users.

PNG (and JPG for that matter) has worked just fine for static image files for decades, but that was a community project created to work around the patent encumbrance of GIF so there's not money to be made and nothing to embrace/extend/extinguish by the big patent happy corps by allowing it to retain status as a 'standard' in active use. Bandwidth, processing power, and storage have come a long way since PNG started giving us better quality than JPG's inconsistent compression artifacts.

/waves old man cane around in the air in a threatening manner

[-] Pechente@feddit.de 38 points 1 year ago

Can someone give me an example where webp gets in the way? I've been using it for a while and both macOS and Windows seem to support the format without any third party extensions for a while now and so do the Affinity apps.

I can use webp like any other image format at this point.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] julianh@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

Webp is a more modern image standard built for the web. Gif has major limitations, and animated gifs are actually bigger in size and worse quality than video files - these days, very few gifs you see on the web are actually .gif files. A while back imgur started converting them to mp4 behind the scenes.

Webp was built with animation in mind, so it works like gif and with much better file size. Even though it's relatively new it should have decent support in most programs that have been updated in the last few years - so you shouldn't necessarily have to jump through hoops to use it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] regbin_@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

WebP is awesome (JPEG-XL is awesomer though). It compresses better than JPEG which was introduced 30(!) years ago. It's time for JPEG to go away.

[-] BeardedPip@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Google being fucking Google.

I downloaded the Save By Type extension because it was impossible to some of my schoolwork this term due to the webp BS.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tvmole@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

Why do so few apps (besides browsers) seem to support it? E.g. Win10 photo viewer and seemingly all my messaging apps

The format itself sounds good, and I see it everywhere online, but is there some reason it's unsupported?

[-] stewsters@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Works great in Ubuntu.

My guess is Microsoft doesn't like it because Google came up with it. Ms has had some issues with recognizing open formats before. Could be you are using old versions of apps too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] optimal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago

webp is cool, but I much prefer JPEG-XL

[-] Potatisen@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Oops, I dropped my Magnum condom for my Magnum JPEG.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wilberfan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I didn't know this either.

"Google launched the WebP format as part of its mission to make loading times faster across the internet. WebP allows websites to display high-quality images — but with much smaller file sizes than traditional formats such as PNG and JPEG."

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] danwardvs@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Since nobody’s mentioned it yet, GIMP is a free and open source photo editor available on Mac, Windows, and Linux that can open .webp files and save them as a different file format easily.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
403 points (92.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36055 readers
768 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS