209
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 77 points 1 week ago

There's NOTHING Safer than having the Epstein Class KNOW where Kids are and WHEN they're Home Alone!

-US Politicians!

[-] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 53 points 1 week ago

Remember folks, age verification is personal identity verification.

[-] VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 week ago

💯 don’t call it age verification - that’s just what the unmasked scooby-doo villain is still hiding behind.

[-] nullify3112@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well they could do it the right way where, for example, you go to your city hall to get a certificate of age where they check your ID. Then some cryptography happens so you only enter a public key from that certificate on a website or OS to verify your age.

The website or OS doesn’t check your ID. City hall doesn’t know your browsing history.

But I’m not fooling myself, that’s not the point of such a law.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

"Key questions remain unanswered, such as the definition of “operating system provider,” the type of verification required, the focus on major commercial platforms, and the potential scope beyond them."

I guarantee this bill is unenforceable. Cars, phones, traffic lights all have have computers with operating systems. All modern tech has an operating system of some sort. Also how do you even verify age? If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can't confirm my id? What about tech that never goes online but has an OS, like a calculator? I can't believe microsoft and apple are not lobbying against this. Who becomes liable if an "underage" person is accidentally given access or if access is denied to an "of age" person. I can just imagine an emt frantically looking for their driver's license so they can use the computerized defibrillator.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 13 points 1 week ago

Microsoft is probably salivating at the idea of being the only legal OS provider.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Microsoft and Apple. The internet will only allow OSs from large American corporations.

I'd like to see the rest of the world say "fuck it" and carry on as before, leaving the Americans to censor themselves. But governments around the world are suddenly rushing to implement very similar terrible laws. It smells very coordinated.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Meta is funding a lot of the lobbyists pushing for age verification laws. Uncoincidentally, Meta both owns a stake in a company providing identity verification as a service, and serves to benefit from not having to moderate its own platforms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

It feels like a Mr. Smith Goes to Washington display would solve this.

Just bring everything that has an operating system in it into the room. Cars, boats, planes, construction equipment, tractors, factories, knock off game consoles, literally every server on the internet.

Show them the ridiculousness of this and maybe we’ll get dragged out by police and charged with contempt of congress

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Don't give them even better ideas. To you it sounds ridiculous, to them it sounds like "we can ban people we don't like from using modern technology by invalidating their age verification"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

If my laptop is offline can I just not use it because it can't confirm my id?

Yes. The powers at be will stop at nothing to take more, and more, and more power away from you. This is human nature.

[-] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

Offline computing?!

But

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

They cant even define an OS. Do i need a fucking login for my wifi fridge and toaster. Such a stupid ffucking law.

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Why does a fridge need to connect to the Internet? Or a toaster? Why does my toothbrush need Bluetooth?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] devolution@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

I'm having a hard time understanding how this is going to keep kids safe.

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

That's because it is never about the children.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

The same way the next laws will keep kids safe. When you leave your front door, you will have to drop your pants so the TSA can check your asshole. It's necessary. You know. To keep kids safe.

/s

🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jalkasieni@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

This is about protecting the entrenched players in the OS games; Microsoft, Google and Apple. The likely end play for all this is the erosion of personal computing so they can rent (and therefore control) all the compute available to you, so you don’t get uppity and think of running your own AI, which they believe will be as integral to everyday life as the internet is today.

[-] Zier@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

Safe? Never. But it will help the pedophiles find more children online. Sickos!

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Why would corporate billionaires and pedophile politicians want to keep kids safe? This has nothing to do with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eggyhead@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Don’t want to compete with a potentially capable Linux? Pay the government to make it illegal!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlexLost@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

In the future, you'll be sentenced to 10 years hard labour for a contraband OS while children are raped openly at lavish parties.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Fuck everything's my about this.

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

The smart doorlock my dad install now needs an age verification now?

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 week ago

Everyone in this comment section, you're just gonna take this? Its been time, but if this is what motivates you to throw bricks at politicians then lets go

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] LostWanderer@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

Ugh, this is so disgusting! They desperately want control over things they should never have! I've shared my opinion will all three of my representatives.

[-] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Kudos on paying them some attention!

Does AIPAC pay them more?

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

unrelated but I just want to say theres like 4 separate comments using the word "TrumpID" to describe this age verification, and i think this would be a great way to mock it just like how conservatives called the aca "ObamaCare"

[-] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 1 week ago

Except it's more ZuckID, since Meta was behind the "grassroots" campaigns and wrote the script "representatives" are using globally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

palintir, meta, google are all behind it. it serves 2 purposes; silencing dissidents and TRACKING women/potential mothers as brood mares.

[-] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, with all these data centers going up, they'll have enough hardware power to track the rest of us, too, not just the women.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jarvis2323@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

Since all TV’s are smart TV’s with an OS this means age verification to watch TV? I think that’s a message that will resonate with the average consumer on what is wrong with this bill

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Primary Josh Gottheimer. Write in anyone else against him. Vote against him or withhold voting at all in the general.

Do not signal that this is tolerated.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Palantir really wants it's fucking database.

All because Petey truly believes that there are demons living in the United States.

[-] TransNeko@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

there are demons living in the USA. all Petey has to do to find the closest one... is look in a mirror.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m so sick of this depraved pedophile oligarch Mossad shit

[-] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Totally unenforceable. You going to prevent people from downloading open-source, noncompliant Linux from Asia or Europe? Good luck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I can just stop being online. I show my library card when I need to renew my stateID

[-] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

If the fascists get much further, possessing a library card will disqualify you from voting.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You think fascists are still going to allow voting?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Arancello@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

And yet another reason to abandon mercan tech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Would this bill ban the use of all operating systems released before it became law? That seems unlikely.

So then how about OSs released before it became law, with patches released afterwards? That also seems unlikely.

So then how about my computer's current OS, which is a heavily patched version of a little hobby OS called Linux, originally released in 1991?

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

you’ll simply not be allowed online with the device.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"But that's unenforceable", some will claim.

And to that, let me remind us all of a little-known concept called cryptographic attestation. If that doesn't ring any bells, then the term "secure boot" should.

Once this shit passes into law, that's the next step. Operating system vendors have their private keys to sign attestation tokens saying "John Johnson is an adult" and you're only getting one if you verify your government ID. When you go to a website, your browser sends your signed token to the website and then the website checks if it's a valid token signed by Microsoft, Apple, or Google.

But Linux?, you may be wondering. No. No Linux. Kiss it good-bye. Your bank will "require" identity attestation for "extra security", and your bank doesn't give a fuck about Linux. Your bank will check against whatever list of public keys they want to trust, and it ain't going to include anything not backed by a global megacorporation.

[-] aurelar@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

It's already the case that banks don't allow their apps to be used on rooted phones. I can imagine a similar possibility for desktop computers. A dreadful possibility, but a possibility nonetheless.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
209 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

84069 readers
533 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS