198
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 month ago

How is this not against the law already?

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago

Because we dont ever elect left wing parties

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

True, both Libs and Cons are right leaning currently. We need Avi

[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Big fan of this guy except for his views on military spending.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd still get him elected and lobby the party for doing domestic defence investment. That'd be easier to achieve than getting con or lib gov't to not spend much more money on foreign equipment. We still have not canceled the F35 purchase.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Because then never help either

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

An actual argument for would be haggling and bargaining at places like markets.

But to pretend selective pricing only happens there is wrong.

[-] aceslip@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago

I can’t see the article. It’s behind a … $750 pay wall?

Is he talking about in person shopping or online shopping? Online shopping should be more regulated to avoid gouging via tracking.

In person is this not already covered under the competition act? Like you can’t charge more than what’s advertised?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

It seems like the Competition Act was amended to water down the relevant bits in the past. Not sure when. Opening section 50(1) shows it was removed.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

They change what's advertised to you based on what the algorithm knows about you.

[-] aceslip@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, that’s online shopping in a nutshell. Does not answer any of my questions.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

This will also happen in person.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

In person, the suggestion was banning camera based price changes.

Also the socialism comment was about public grocery stores.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

That, I think, is part of the impetus for switching to digital price tags. The tag will literally be able to charge the displyed price depending on who is walking down the aisle. This idea has been patented, and probably not by someone trying to keep anyone from doing it.

[-] redknight942@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

The budding companion market is gonna love this!

Rent out a grocery trip with grandpa (fixed income), or maybe John who just got out of county.

??? Profit.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nope, it's worse. Prices will be raised on people in too tough a spot to go somewhere else. Grandpa and John will pay the increased price because they don't have cars and this store is either the only one close enough to walk to or the near a bus stop within a route or two. If they raise the price on someone with more money, they can probably choose to go somewhere else. Unless all the chains cooperate on individual customer based price fixing I guess. Quick, someone patent that, if it hasn't been already.

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

Oh. In person gouging can be automated too, now. Seen notes on the systems. If you see anywhere start using e-ink price tags its for this.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hm? It worked the first few seconds, then the popup and now not anymore. Weird mechanjsm.

Also, too broken for even Archive to get formating properly. But at least it's readable.

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

You need an adblocker works fine for me on Firefox with ublock

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] veeesix@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

So it’s ok to charge more if you look rich? Why eat the rich when you can fleece ‘em?

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

No,charge more if your ad profile says youre busy/rushed right now, charge more if you cant get to other stores, charge more if you have dietary restrictions...

[-] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

"Socialism doesn't work," says man who has never tried socialism. News at 11

[-] Akh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Charge conservatives twice as much

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

That’s fine. Start charging corporations hundreds of times what you’d charge a person.

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

And the world keeps plunging into a corporate dystopia

[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Get fucked Clown Ford. Love to see you out of public office.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Doug Ford wants old people to be ripped off.

[-] pentastarm@piefed.ca 4 points 1 month ago

"Pentastarm says she will not ban herself from continuing to not vote for Doug Ford. More at 11."

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

I'm just visiting and curious why you guys keep electing this guy? Isn't he a crack head? You're not supposed to be taking notes from the morons on this side of the border.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago
  1. You're thinking of Rob Ford, not his brother Doug.

  2. The Fords pioneered the Trump schtick before Trump was ever President. America often tries out their stupid ideas here first.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Ah I see, thanks for explaining :)

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Rob was a better person then his borther ever was, just because you watch one youtube video about a person doesn't mean you know him.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Absolutely agree there

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

GET THAT PRICK OUT OF OFFICE.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

If this were to the south, I would say it was a gambit to, you know, try to keep those types of people away.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I guess Canada is not for sale because you found a better deal elsewhere, duggie?

[-] djdarren@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, socialism.

Words don't mean anything anymore, do they?

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
198 points (99.0% liked)

Ontario

3642 readers
7 users here now

A place to discuss all the news and events taking place in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Rules

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS