23
The Simpsons (lemmy.world)
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] null@lemmy.org 8 points 1 month ago

2026 and they're still frothing at the mouth over masks and vaccinations.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These are the people who constantly whined about "NPCs" just following directions without thought, showing the same line of dialogue 6 years on lol

[-] slurp@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

It shows the trend but the colors make this look far more severe than the scores reflect

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah they should have had black as 5.x, grey as 6.x, white as 7.x, green as 8.x, and gold as 9.x

Or just use the Blizzard/rpg rarity colors for user defined groupings so that people can make their own thresholds for how to opine for whatever ratings.

For example, I typically think of each number as three categories: low-7s, mid 7s, and high 7s. A low 7 is watchable and decent, a mid 7 may be pretty good but not have a ton of truly moving content or messaging, and high 7s are like the last rating of ultimate popcorn - fantastic, but relatively intellectually empty. And as soon as you hit 8.0, to get there, it has to start having some levels of boundary-pushing of my expectations AND be very good.

So I would relate all of the 7s as like a Diablo green item rarity, maybe with high 7s being blues. High 8s maybe starts to get into yellows, and 9s are legendaries with mid and high 9s being reds or like Diablo ancients. Very low 7s and high 6s would definitely be whites, with mid and low 6s being greys. And anything under there... Probably also greys? Maybe have a gradient where the lower the rating, the more transparent it gets. 1.0 or 0.0 (whatever the lowest is) would have to still be visible, though.

[-] Aedis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

And now I know SCmSTR's very arbitrary scale compared to Diablo rarerity scale colors. What a time to be alive.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Everyone just ignoring the vaccine scepticism eh?

[-] fun_times@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Every episode of modern Simpsons:

"[First name] [Last name]! [Pronoun]'s the best [occupation] in all of [country]."

  • Lisa Simpson, directly to the audience.

"That's right, Lisa. I'm here to [ad for a song/book/movie/space-nazi]."

  • [First name] [Last name].
[-] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

just checked out of curiosity, s6e3 is a clip show, and s9e11 is a musical clip show

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The idea of doing a clip show only 6 seasons in is diabolical.

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

In the '70s/'80s, one clip show per season was pretty common.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

That's why we all love Community. In "Paradigms of Human Memory" (Season 2, Episode 21) it was super expensive because all the clips were new. It was a great episode in general too.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and nobody liked it. It was just there to save the show some money.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 1 month ago

Cartoonists, too, need vacations

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You could hire enough of them so they can get their vacation.

[-] otacon239@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I guess it made more sense back when people didn’t catch every episode. Still glad it’s not the norm these days.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Stargate did one in the first season.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Clerks the TV show did it for their 1st episode.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It's the second episode but your point stands.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I've watched nearly episode in the first 20 seasons of The Simpsons three times or more but I have always skipped those episodes

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

As someone who grew up with the Simpsons and also pretty recently watched the first 29 seasons again, the first 9 seasons we definitely the best seasons. They're timeless. The show became too afraid to be offensive.

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Aren't we up to season 37 now? Old chart?

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Season 23 episode 22: Rating 3.9: Lisa Goes Gaga: Lisa helps Lady Gaga and learns the importance of being yourself.

Season 30 episode 18: Rating 4.6: Bart vs. Itchy and Scratchy: Krusty releases an all-female reboot of Itchy and Scratchy

We can guess at why those two got the lowest ratings of the entire series.

[-] randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I could guess, but why don't you just go ahead and say it? I'm not sure what you're implying, it could be anything.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I'd say the Gaga was for pandering to fans of a celebrity to get them to watch. Making a Gaga centric episode at the height of Gaga's popularity is pandering. As compared to having a few lines by George Harrison or Paul McCartney which were at their height of popularity 20 years earlier. When contemporary celebrities were used like Smashing Pumpkins is was as a cameo, not the focus of the entire episode.

The all woman Itchy Scratchy episode would be panned because it's punching down on the feminist movie remakes.

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thank you for the info, i assumed it would be "treehouse of horror" episodes. My mum didn't let me watch them and said they were horrifying 🤧😭

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I remember how horrifying the first Treehouse of Horror was with checks notes an Edgar Allen Poe rendition of The Raven.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

They're not as good as the old ones by a lot, admittedly they're frequently pretty bad but I still kind of feel like the treehouse of horror episodes tend to have at least one passable story and are usually the highlight of the season.

[-] Janx@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Everyone:
Anti-vaxxers: "You are just getting vaccines to be trendy, not to protect your family and others!"

[-] thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Are they audience ratings? If so the episode quality is probably even lower towards the end as some audiences will have dropped out so you're only including the data of folk who stuck with it.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Funny how it looks like every season they continue the fire gets worse

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 0 points 1 month ago

Ah, yes. "Everyone whose opinion I disagree with is only bandwagoning onto that opinion because it's cool."

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

Are you actually unaware this is a real phenomenon?

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social -1 points 1 month ago

Sure, sure. But, also, the "cool" opinion is popular for a reason. And it's often a good reason.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

This is consistent with my idea (which I've long had) that there was yet another quality drop around the time they switched to HD. The episodes from the 2000s are mostly still perfectly watchable IMHO, the ones from the 2010s much less so and I don't think I've ever watched a Simpsons episode from the 2020s, so can't say anything about that.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Last year a started watching from the beginning and watched until I found that I pretty consistently did not enjoy the episodes. I agree with your assessment. The last episode that I watched was from '13 or '14.

[-] sheridan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Was there a major staff change for season 9? That's when it appears to have markedly declined.

[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the show was never the same after Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein left to make Mission Hill in the late 90s. Additionally, Futurama became a primary though to people like Groening so Simpsons suffered stagnation majorly.

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

I've literally never heard of mission hill. Sounds like they should have stayed on The Simpsons

[-] Cratermaker@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

No way, I loved that show. It was great but flew under the radar.

[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Can't blame them for wanting to make their own thing, and they did a pretty good job (even if the TV stations kind of fucked them over by putting them on some bad timeslots.) Overall, I'm glad the show exists.

Art director for Mission Hill went on to work as a director for Disney (also one of the first women to work as a sole-director at Disney, coincidentally) and Bill Oakley / Josh Weinstein continued to work as writers, so I think it worked out for most parties involved in the production.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Seasons 3-8 are generally considered "golden age" simpsons. Theres a lull for a few seasons where it gets very patchy, then it kinda enters a long silver age where episodes are fairly consistently good, with few poor ones and even fewer universally agreed upon greats.

Many fans completely ignore 9+. Others argue where sliver age begins.

The ratings only show the golden age and then slowly declining popularity, because popularity is only ever a loose proxy for quality.

[-] ninjabard@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It wasn't "cool to be vaxxed and boosted."

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yes it was. That wasn't the primary reason to do it, just a little bonus. But it was and is.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
23 points (87.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11594 readers
856 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS