130
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Aradino@hexbear.net 67 points 1 week ago

Weird how that lines up with the collapse of the soviet union

[-] red_giant@hexbear.net 44 points 1 week ago

It also lines up with 10 years after Reagan. I bet if you did a plot of “early 20s married homeowners” it would look the same but the plunge would start at 1982.

[-] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 38 points 1 week ago

I'd argue that Reagan was the result of the western elites losing their fear of the Soviet Union.

[-] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

I'm inclined to agree, it's the point were they gave up on class collaborationism and decided that pauperization and a stick would be more in their favor than dropping crumbs to the labor aristocrats. Also on a superstructural level the point were they began the rollback against anything won in the 1960s and 1970s in regards to civil rights.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago

I really do believe the BS of austerity and tax breaks for the rich from that era really signaled the beginning of the end for capitalism. When you think about it, almost every industry has basically been making money by living on the corpse of the 80s. It's hard for me to put in to words, but everything produced feels like the 80s but with a different spin.

Ultimate 80s yuppie Donald Trump being President is the perfect poster child of this.

[-] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 32 points 1 week ago

Awfully convenient that "the end of history" seemed to align with the end of having to compete with the only other superpower (wink wink nudge nudge)

[-] lucidity@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

the "luck" here and its just existing at the same time the USSR put competitive pressure on western countries not to immiserate the proletariat

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago

With Millennials beaten into ground and swept under the rug, and now Zoomers reaching their 30s facing the same problems plus extra, we are now looking at two entire genrations of people left to rot.

We can't keep throwing people away like this. It makes me sick.

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Eventually the people will throw back. It's unfortunate that it's taken 2 or more generations to get there but people can only be pushed so far

[-] miz@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

how weird that avocado toast was invented right around the same time as the illegal dissolution of the Soviet Union

https://redsails.org/concessions/

[-] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago

I agree with the sentiment but "and married" could skew this wildly for all we know, since marriage has changed a lot over that time period. It should be its own control variable!

I'm under 30, have a mortgage and a partner, but we're not planning on ever getting married! I suppose materialism impacts this; if we had the means for a wedding ceremony without it impacting long term financial plans maybe we would think differently (and our generation would too), but the institution of marriage has fallen out of favour with a lot people in my age bracket, regardless of means.

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

we're in the same boat but i guess there's a bunch of tax incentives for being married or something

[-] BGDelirium@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Get court married with a small house party. That's what I did. A few hundred dollars for food, drink, tux, and dress

[-] Wordplay@hexbear.net 20 points 1 week ago

Is anyone familiar with the Melinda Cooper argument that there was a concerted shift in the US / Canada from capitalist distribution of surplus via wages to assets? Obviously in the long run this alone would cause a great stagnation of economic growth, which is what we've been seeing for decades now as real production stalls and asset inflation skyrockets.

I haven't had a chance to read her book(s) yet, but prima facie it seems a compelling argument.

[-] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

Piketty said the same thing in Capital of the Twenty First Century, arguing when the rate of return on assets is larger than the rate of growth (R > G), stagnation follows. The financial sector was in shambles when he published that book.

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
130 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

23005 readers
35 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS