294
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Only a week into the job, the North Dakota Republican Party’s executive director has resigned after a media outlet publicized some of his social media posts that were demeaning toward women and dismissed concerns raised by Black people about racism.

The party announced the resignation Monday of Dave Roetman, who previously worked for the South Dakota GOP. He quit seven days after being hired and a few days after Forum News Service reported about his posts and replies on X, formerly known as Twitter. The posts dated from just over a year ago to as recently as this month.

Many of the posts and replies were about political issues. But they also included crass comments, such as replying “she seems nice” to several posts of women in revealing clothing, and responding unfavorably to a woman in a plus-sized swimsuit. In another reply, he speculated about whether women should be addressed as “broads” or “dames,” adding that debates about gender and language are why “men are distancing themselves from women professionally.”

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago

In another reply, he speculated about whether women should be addressed as “broads” or “dames,”

I didn't realize they had social media in the 1950s.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Insta-gams

Also, as sensational as the story is it feels like the lede is somewhat buried:

Roetman had succeeded Samantha Holly, who resigned in September as executive director, citing “several obstacles that have made it difficult for me to continue working here” in her resignation letter.

I want to know more about that.

[-] Waldowal@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

With this type of publicity over his racist and misogynistic comments, he's decided on a presidential run instead.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Let's get this guy in front of a crowd!

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Sounds about white for North Dakota.

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

My wife and I strayed through North Dakota once on our way back to Canada. It was during a really intense heat wave several years back, so the trip through was nothing but tall grass and heat ripples stretching on and on toward patches of dense trees. This continued exactly the same way throughout the entirety of the state. There was little to no evidence of civilization anywhere. At one point during our search for gas we came across a tiny town of maybe twenty people who were setting up for quite the party at the general store/town hall/only functional building around. They seemed bewildered to see outsiders but were kind enough to explain that half of the signs pointing toward the nearest gas station no longer led to operational gas stations. This may have saved our lives as we pressed ever onward, now equipped with the knowledge of which signs were real.

Eventually we even collided with a duck (purely by accident) and it ejected its anus (the entire organ, not just the contents) onto the grill of our vehicle where it remained as a small gift for untold miles. Then we were faced with our final dilemma; spending the night in the middle of North Dakota, or finding lodging on a rather unfriendly reservation in Montana, so we decided to just cross the border and take our chances in Saskatchewan. I really couldn't tell you if that played out any better, but we did make it home eventually.

[-] TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca 31 points 10 months ago

Wildly irrelevant to the post, but man that was a good read. Carry on.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Needed more banjos.

[-] Nekobambam@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I was expecting a Stephen King-type story development but was (un)pleasantly surprised by duck anus on a grill. Two thumbs up.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I kind of enjoyed the tangent. Dammit I’m only in my 30s I’m not supposed to be going full old person yet

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

NDRP: I don’t understand, we vetted him thoroughly!

Everyone: did you read his Xitter posts?

NDRP: . . .

[-] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

No. No. Don't you see? They were "kinda buried". I bet you could find the same content on his Facebook and truth social accounts, too.

[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

As a North Dakota I'm surprised by the resignation. There is almost zero accountability here. The GOP and more so Maga has taken over. The DNC/NPL is basically dead here. The right gets free reign. ND is in a rough spot politically and I do not see a fix for decades. At one time we were a state that had to fend for itself and became a success story for socialist programs. Farmers coops, state bank and mill. Progressive prison system and produces top notch schools and exported highly educated people. It is all reversing because of greed driven by oil and gas. Write us off we as we will not help progress society or help this planet due to greed and corruption.

[-] rjthyen@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Does North Dakota have as many religious "pro-life" nuts as SD? I find here that most the ppl against abortion rights were women, so ours possible ND GOP is worried they might lose access to their pro-life gravy train. One issue voters drive me absolutely nuts

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

Wow, what an odd thing to do for a republikkkan.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Who made him resign, it certainly wasn’t the GOP, they were too busy nutting over him owning black people and women.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — Only a week into the job, the North Dakota Republican Party’s executive director has resigned after a media outlet publicized some of his social media posts that were demeaning toward women and dismissed concerns raised by Black people about racism.

The party announced the resignation Monday of Dave Roetman, who previously worked for the South Dakota GOP.

But they also included crass comments, such as replying “she seems nice” to several posts of women in revealing clothing, and responding unfavorably to a woman in a plus-sized swimsuit.

In a post about a Black reporter who left a music festival after a man called her a racist word, Roetman replied, “Narcissist?” On a post of a news story about Black Americans moving out of the U.S., he replied with a meme that read, “Well... ... bye.”

North Dakota Republican Party Chair Sandi Sanford said she was “very disappointed” by Roetman’s posts.

AP writer Summer Ballentine in Jefferson City, Missouri, contributed to this story.


The original article contains 411 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
294 points (99.7% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS