30
submitted 1 month ago by Reannlegge@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

In December, Smith's government invoked the Charter's notwithstanding clause on the transgender rules.

The notwidthstanding clause should not be allowed to over ride international medical consensus, see WPATH.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So if I'm parsing this correctly

The laws generally don't deny transgender healthcare

An Alberta Judge decided the laws deny transgender healthcare with a "notwithstanding clause"

A court case is challenging the clause use here

The people behind the case want to Amend their challenge

and a Judge has denied the request?

Kind of feels like a string of double negatives. Alberta teens can not not not not not get healthcare.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Smith decided she knows better than the WHO and WPATH so she used the notwidthstanding clause preventing health care of minors who are Trans or Gender Diverse. The organizations that the judge denied where fighting the use of the notwidstanding clause.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 1 month ago

I'll ammend the above

this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12031 readers
628 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS