I was very confused by this sentence until I realized it's a programming thingy.
Yeah it needs the word that inserting into the sentence.
Bugs that Rust won't catch.
I'm not a rust programmer, can anyone with experience in systems programming explain a legitimate use case for the uutils other than weakening the GPL? The auther even admits that several coreutils are still GNU in 26.04 which begs one to ask "why the rewrite?"
The goal is to create a more secure version of the program. Since (safe) rust eliminates entire classes of security relevant bugs, a rust version has the potential to be much more secure that the C version. And since rust can eliminate entire classes of bugs, we can put more energy into finding bugs like the ones presented in the article.
The weaker license is unfortunate, though.
plus Rust is a more modern language with better tool chain and language feature than C/C++
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
