14
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago

The author just push LLM nonsense. PWA's are great for field app where internet is scarce and without the need to rely on google to keep side loading possible. Not to mention the nightmare if you even want to deploy the side loaded app to a fleet of phone without needing to use google play store to publish it as an internal app.

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

Before publishing, that text really needed a self-review/read-through. So many obvious issues to spot. Numerous typos like 'techjnical ', issues like double words 'missing missing', and so on.

[-] ernest314@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The author seems to predicate his arguments on the assumption that "the web needs to be the development platform of choice" or something like that? I feel like I kept asking "why does the web need to do all these things" while reading the article; it feels like the author just assumes that a maximalist web platform is desirable? That having everything authored on/for the web is a forgone conclusion?

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

Until we have an OS that is literally just a web browser and does nothing except run PWAs and open web pages, that line of thought won't make sense.

[-] ernest314@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

it's definitely what google was going for

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Unfortunate, that they didn't include Edge in the Browser feature coverage comparison list.

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

I've noticed a lot of consumer embedded products have been using PWAs for flashing and configuring devices (Meshtastic, Meshcore, Betaflight, am32 configurator, etc). I have to open Chromium to use them because they don't work with my normal browser (and I probably don't want my normal browser being able to access arbitrary USB devices).

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago

and I probably don’t want my normal browser being able to access arbitrary USB devices

It has a permission check, just like location access, microphone access, webcam access, etc.

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

Do you prefer to have everything as a native application then?

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago

I guess there's a blurry line between an "application" and a web site. But, generally, for open source applications, I'd rather them be native. Preferably, the applications would actually be native (e.g. Qt, GTK, Jetpack Compose, etc).

[-] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

No, there's a clear distinction between a native application and a website. I could go on and on about my hate for native app and it's difficulty to develop for more than one platform, but the point is only SOME apps needs to be native IMHO. Apps like CAD, multimedia editor and player, server application, and developer toolchain. Something like instant messaging, video conference, multimedia streaming, forum can be a web app.

this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
14 points (85.0% liked)

Web Development

5648 readers
38 users here now

Welcome to the web development community! This is a place to post, discuss, get help about, etc. anything related to web development

What is web development?

Web development is the process of creating websites or web applications

Rules/Guidelines

Related Communities

Wormhole

Some webdev blogsNot sure what to post in here? Want some web development related things to read?

Heres a couple blogs that have web development related content

CreditsIcon base by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS