29

To understand how a New York City private jet tax could actually be implemented, you need to understand who controls the airports.

The Port Authority is a bi-state agency jointly controlled by the governors of New York and New Jersey with an annual operating budget of $10.1 billion and a proposed $45 billion capital plan from 2026 – 2035. It operates JFK, LaGuardia, Newark Liberty, and Teterboro — all rated high tax-risk under current political conditions. Teterboro Airport, which does not allow scheduled airline flights and only services private flights, handles approximately 177,000 arrivals and departures annually.

Westchester County Airport (HPN) is not a Port Authority facility. It is owned and operated by Westchester County — outside Mamdani’s direct political sphere and outside the joint gubernatorial control structure of the Port Authority. This makes it the most insulated major reliever airport in the New York metro under current political conditions.

Republic Airport (FRG) on Long Island is New York State property — its vulnerability depends on whether Governor Hochul aligns with Mamdani’s agenda, which remains an open question.

Key policy context: The Port Authority has the authority to set fees, surcharges, and access terms at its facilities without requiring standard legislative processes in many scenarios. The question isn’t just whether a tax gets proposed — it’s whether the mechanism to implement it already exists. In many cases, it does.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

This whole article just reads like a deaf man who can’t hear the woosh of a falling guillotine blade.

[-] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 10 points 1 week ago

The author wanted to make Mamdani's policies sound bad, but all I could think after each paragraph was "hell yeah".

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right? Here's a good example:

If you own an apartment in New York and don’t live there full-time, you’re taxed. If your heirs inherit assets in New York, they’re taxed at thresholds that now reach the upper middle class. The logical extension of this trajectory — and the question the entire private aviation industry should be asking — is: what about the $70 million jet you landed at Teterboro this morning?

It's very interesting to see just how out of touch they are. You can even see him trying to appeal to non-billionaires by making it sound like he actually gives a fuck about them. "Omg, you're inheriting a million dollar property? How will you handle the taxes?!? 😱" Then quickly pivots to a more familiar scenario to people in his echelon: "what if I have to pay a fair tax on this ridiculous lifestyle I'm living?!?

[-] StormDefence2024@fedia.io -3 points 1 week ago

its not the rich who live a ridiculous lifestyle. It you. Quit your job. Walk away. You don't need it.

[-] binux@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

This is such a funny thing to say lmao, if it's bait then it needs to be in a museum. Bravo Vince

"You're ridiculous for participating in the society you were raised in, how dare you. You need to run out into the woods like Ted Kaczynski, never pay taxes again, and survive like the kid from Hatchet. Oh? You have people that you care about? Just forget about them, duh. Oh? I'm a hypocrite because I'm typing this on a device that was obtained through said 'ridiculous lifestyle'? Nah, false equivalence. Just trust me, I'm basically Siddhartha Gautama. All I need is Lemmy."

[-] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I can't tell if you're serious or not.

[-] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Go ahead. Tax every one I have.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

Oh no my private... Wait, I don't have a jet. And if I did, I could afford a tax.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Mamdami should be president

[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately he’s wasn't born in the United States.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

I both love and hate it when Fortune forgets that The Poors can read their garbage too 😄

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Let's be honest here, they didn't forget, they didn't even factor or care about the opinion of the working class. It's Fortune, not Pay Check to Pay Check magazine.

[-] Mister_Hangman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Wait are people at fortune mad and scared?

That’s my fetish.

[-] parzival@lemmy.hkserv.space 4 points 1 week ago
[-] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Lmao, exactly. Mamdani can tax all of my private jets at 100%* for all I care, and I’m not even in NY!

*I of course am a normal person, not a bloodsucking billionaire or whatever, and own 0 private jets, nor will I ever own one.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

Good. Great, even. Fuck these rich asshole climate criminals.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Fuck you and your private jet

[-] treehugger6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Am I supposed to feel bad for sociopathic billionaires?

[-] Dryad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Truly baffling to read just how disconnected some people are.

[-] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

Good.

I'm stuck using paper straws all so some cunt can fly in private luxury?

When my butler read this to me, I couldn't contain my outrage.

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No friend of mine owns a private jet. Tax them out of existence

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

Oh no, not my private jet…

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If he pays his fair share of taxes... He would likely still own everything he owns but wouldn't have as many 0's adorning the big important number in his bank account. Just devestating to see someone forced to pay their fair share, lol

[-] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

We need to find cheap and easy ways for everyday people to build MANPAD's explicitly to shoot down private jets. Make it so that pilots won't want to fly them, and the rich will be too scared

[-] birne@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

177k arrivals and departures per year from Teterboro? That is one privat jet every 3 minutes. That is insanse.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

They probably aren't all private jets. A lot of people own small prop planes. It's not cheap, but you don't have to be a billionaire to fly.

[-] isgleas@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I almost fainted, then re-read the header and saw shey will tax my jet, so I got relief. I thought they would be taxing my yatch!

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Nice of him to include tax evasion strategies right in the communique to his socioeconomic classmates.

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is tax avoidance, not tax evasion. The goal is to avoid owing taxes, not to avoid paying taxes owed.

To the lowly taxpayer, it all looks the same, that they refuse to pay their fair share, but legally there's a pretty big difference.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

99% of the people think "good!". The other 1% have the power to make this go away.

[-] xSikes@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

Just do it and shut up. Talk about something else. How are the bees doing this season?

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Better! They figured out a vaccine for the virus that has been causing the majority of bee colony collapse and we’ve been seeing huge turnarounds. They treated them in my area and they have been flourishing this year, it’s been a huge relief to see them in healthy numbers again.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

OMG, that is wonderful news! I actually hadn’t heard about this. Off to search for more info about it.

[-] Snowies@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ahh yes. The “Lemmy” users with private jets.

Huge cross-over in that Venn diagram 🙄

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Lenny users

Lemmy's evil rich people only sister instance

this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
29 points (96.8% liked)

politics

29884 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS