235
submitted 6 days ago by XLE@piefed.social to c/firefox@fedia.io

Facebook's Senior VP of Marketing
is now
Mozilla's Chief Financial Officer

Facebook's VP of Ads
is now
Mozilla's Senior VP of Product
(The apparent most senior position)

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 88 points 6 days ago

I'm looking forward to the long articles shedding light on how Mozilla was slowly corrupted by it's own success and ultimately failed.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's just so obviously been happening a while now. Good thing Waterfox and Librefox exist.

[-] univers3man@piefed.world 51 points 6 days ago

They only exist as long as Firefox and Mozilla exist. They all depend on Mozilla for updates, patching and core functionality.

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 18 points 6 days ago

Yep, and browsers are apparently notoriously hard to build and maintain. We're cooked.

[-] scytale@piefed.zip 9 points 6 days ago

I'm waiting to see if Ladybird takes off. They have some questionable sponsors, but you need money to get started. Hopefully they stick to their guns of being independent if they become successful.

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Ladybird has both questionable sponsors and questionable leadership and past drama.

Servo is the one I'm excited for.

[-] Brummbaer@pawb.social 5 points 5 days ago

Because the specs are a pile of shit. I can't prove it, but I'm pretty sure that google helped with that.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago

I can be of assistance. From the World Wide Web consortium, the group who creates the Web standards:

This specifies a browser API for the measurement of advertising performance.

Editors:

  • Andrew Paseltiner (Google)
  • Andy Leiserson (Mozilla)
  • Benjamin Case (Meta)
  • Benjamin Savage (Meta)
  • Charlie Harrison (Google)
  • Martin Thomson (Mozilla)

Yes Mozilla itself was working with Facebook back as far as 2022, and was basing this work on their telemetry which was pretty controversial back in 2018.

[-] Brummbaer@pawb.social 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Damn, the web really is just a big pile of advertising shit now.

Thanks - I guess we really need to come up with alternatives.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 7 points 6 days ago

And Mozilla will exist as long as Google needs to have a functional opponent they can point to. Firefox is maintained on Google's dollar.

[-] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah but Firefox only exists because of the large community willing to work on it. That community can go to Waterfox or Librefox and continue development under better leadership.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 days ago

Why is it even structured like a corporation?

[-] ozymandias@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 days ago

because as soon as people figure out they can make money off of something it gets ruined.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 23 points 6 days ago

it's two separate entities, a corporation and a nonprofit.

i don't know why it's like that.

[-] iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app 24 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

In the USA there are restrictions on what types of activities a not-for-profit company can do. For example, you can't pay a not-for-profit to do work for you. So a common approach is to make a for-profit company owned by the not-for-profit. It will pay staff and any bills associated with work for hire or from selling stuff, and donate any money left over to the not-for-profit. Since companies are taxed based on profits, and donations are tax deductible, it lets companies get around the restrictions.

It sounds dodgy as fuck, but I worked for an open source company structured like this and it is apparently common. The COO even had a letter from the state in a file stating that it was okay. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago

Plugging Servo. They're testing nightly builds now.

https://servo.org/

[-] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Wooo! Finally! Glad too see this day come

Edit: and saw they support OpenHarmony too, which is extra nice

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I'm watching both servo and ladybug with great interest.

[-] Hairyfishnuts@feddit.online 15 points 5 days ago

I've been with these boys since the Netscape days. This is about the last thing I wanted to do but I'm just gonna have ta bail on FF. Damnit man.

[-] mursejoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

Dude what do I go to now? I avoid Google as much as possible. I use Safari on Mac but my main PC is Linux. I’ve been using FF for a looooong time. I will not participate in anything Meta related.

[-] Mucki@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The good thing is you are certainly not alone. Just look at all the rather new options that have emerged ever since it became clear that Mozilla is failing itself and "us". Don't be sad, things change every know and then, and freedom is waiting for you. This is a libregang post.

[-] newton@feddit.online 17 points 6 days ago
[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 40 points 6 days ago

My concern is that if Firefox disappears entirely, all of its forks will also disappear. None of the current forks' dev teams are set up to be full maintainers of the whole product. They only take what Mozilla release and modify from there.

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 12 points 6 days ago

So where would be best to move on? Librewolf or tor?

[-] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 6 days ago
  • If you're looking for a drop-in Firefox replacement, WaterFox is good.
  • LibreWolf is great for privacy by default.
  • Tor Browser is something you only want to use if it's alongside using Tor.
[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 3 points 5 days ago

Already switched to WaterFox when they announced AI in FireFox and already have LibreWolf set up just in case and tor is still in my test phase, need some more time with it.

Used FireFox since 2006-2007 and was happy to learn it has other variants, but hate that these corporate bastards have to ruin everything.

[-] baconmonsta@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

Surely nobody can predict what happens next...

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Gross, guess I should finally switch over to Ironfox or Waterfox or Librewolf or whatever...

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

You mean all the forks that rely entirely on the Firefox engineering team to exist?

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

*relied

The forks already exist now, so the cat's kinda out of the bag. Sure, they may benefit from updates from Mozilla, but it's not like they're just going to up and disappear or stop working all of the sudden.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 points 5 days ago

What regulatory body could have the authority to audit Mozilla, recognize that there's suits cashing in millions at the expense of the common good, and do some spring cleaning ?

this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
235 points (99.2% liked)

Firefox

4 readers
8 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS