I rarely agree with them but I never saw anything worth a ban. For example I still believe the horrors against Uyghur people, but I also didn't realize how biased some of the reporting was, and cowbee helped point that out.
Biased, how?
Fuck, man, I struggle to think of a red-painted genocide Cowbee hasn't defended. Cowbee defends the joint invasion of Poland of the Soviets with the fucking Nazis. Stalin is one of their favorite figures to simp for. They defend fucking North Korea.
Lunacy like that has no place in any community that claims to not accept fascism.
Ohh he's legit alright. Legitimately need to touch a lot of grass. He's the typical chronically online redditor but on lemmy and instead of staking their territory on some fandom they hovering around protecting dictators.
In my experience, Cowbee is not much more than a verbose variant of your usual tankie shithead. I've seen him deny the Uyghur genocide, the Holodomor, the ethnic cleansing operations of the NKVD et co...
And, of course, the mandatory simping for the Soviet Union. He's insisted that single-candidate elections under Stalin were actually super democratic, and not at all the imposition of a tiny bureaucratic vanguard on the great mass of Soviet workers.
Said verbosity made me engage with him much more than I normally would have otherwise, it gave him an air of knowledge and it did feel like he had done more "research" than I did, at least on some things.
w.r.t. the Uyghur genocide he says all these claims go back to one journalist (apparently), but I've not investigated the claim to know any better
...Stalin had his "war communism" spiel where he banned factions so I'm pretty sure he wasn't democratic, though.
w.r.t. the Uyghur genocide he says all these claims go back to one journalist (apparently), but I’ve not investigated the claim to know any better
There's a particularly partisan journalist who beats the drum very loudly, but the claims are supported by a much broader selection of evidence.
Yes a while back not cowbee. But another tankie was attacking someone in a thread with regards to the oppression of the Uhygers. Crowing how he was the only one with the truth. How everyone else was merely spouting unsubstantiated CIA agitprop. And couldn't provide any links to back up their claims. I immediately did. And of course their first action was to attack not even the messenger of the claims. Which was family members of people being held by the Chinese government. But the host of the media segment on which they appeared. I wasn't quite sure what to call this fallacy, as it wasn't technically attacking the messenger. It was even further removed than that. And just as stupid as it sounded.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
When I said "there's lots of independent evidence from victims" he related it to how that's also the case for the "white genocide" spiel (which both of us thought to be false) and then went on to say I was therefore engaging in "genocide denialism" the same I thought of him.
Never had a good interaction with Cowbee, they for sure a Tankie tho.
Cowbee is harmless. Chronically online weirdo who will answer a question you didn't ask with 15 cited paragraphs from 4 books, 2 articles, and 3 papers. All of it perfect. It's honestly as impressive as it is weird and sad. Site would be significantly less interesting without em.
Usually incredibly biased papers. Honestly incredible they’re able to find stuff that biased, they must be scrolling past pages and pages of real sources to get to the misinformation.
I mean, I've mostly found it impressive, even if his blatant biases are glaring; it's difficult to prove him wrong in a manner that's satisfactory (granted I feel I have on some points, he just reframes away everything like a worm)
The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it.
The worminess is part of it, I've seen people not engage with the text, or reframe an argument. What cowbee does is avant guarde, bespoke, couture communism apologia. This place is his canvas and his words are his art. If you told me he was just a performative communist banksy, I would believe you.
Iirc their bit is ml instead of communist
Elegant wordsmithing yourself. I get what you mean, I didn't give it as much thought prior.
Thanks.
I remember digging into those sources and found them less than impressive or they were saying something other than what the actual topic was. Might be a case of dropping so many hard to find sources (some random book) that you know nobody is checking that
🍿🍿 quitting Netflix was a great move.
"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"
Welcome to MoG!
Meanwhile On Grad
Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!
What is a Tankie?
(caution of biased source)
Basic Rules:
Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.
Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.
Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether it be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.
Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users, as it handwaves their extremism.
Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post, rather than engaging in arguments that lack mutual agreement.
Brigading/Trolling — If you're here because this community was linked in another thread, please refrain from maliciously voting, commenting, or manipulating the post in any way. This includes alt accounts. All votes are public, and if you are found to be brigading, you will be banned. Good-faith and honest communication is an exception.
Tankies can explain their views, but may be criticised or challenged for them. Any minor infraction of the rules may result in a warning and possibly a temporary ban.
You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically last only 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction doubles the duration. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.