692
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fkn@lemmy.world 134 points 1 year ago

My God is American internet awful

[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

If you have 100mbps of non bandwidth capped internet in America, you're doing damn good for yourself.

[-] nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

But what if it costs $95/mo, there are no alternatives and the price has nearly doubled in 10 years from $55?

I sure don't feel that great.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] eatham@aussie.zone 15 points 1 year ago

It's a lot better than Australian internet. I'm getting 20-50mbps

[-] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I had 2Mbps (yes, bits, not bytes) until 2020. Then I moved out. Pretty sure that my parents house still only gets that same speed. And this is in fucking Germany, a pretty densely populated country.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] fkn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That sucks too...

[-] Nioxic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I can ONLY get 1gbit, where i live. (Denmark)

[-] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Denmark is also around 1/200th of the size of the us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mysterious_old_man@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It depends. I grew up in the country and my parents still have to use phone hotspots for internet which works well for streaming but forget about any gaming. I live in a fairly major metropolitan city now and my internet is pretty good, although I've noticed my download speeds get throttled sometimes

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It can be, but I live in a semi-rural neighborhood outside of a town that doesn't even have 100,000 people and I'm still getting 400/400 on fiber (and can get higher speeds if I want to pay for them).

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Saff@lemmy.ml 66 points 1 year ago

If you’re going to initiate a new rollout of tech, why rollout already out of date stuff? Just mandate fibre to the prem and 1 gigabit minimum from the start. It will take 15 years to complete anyway!

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Government officials in areas where 100 Mbps internet isn’t already available are too busy making sure trans people can’t use the toilet or play high school sports.

[-] legion02@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They're also waiting for their trans porn to download.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JakoJakoJako13@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That's way too hard for this country.

How will the isps get another government grant to roll out the next bit of outdated tech?

[-] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How will the isps get another government grant to ~~roll out the next bit of outdated tech~~ outright refuse to update any infrastructure and perform stock buybacks instead?

FTFY. Google the Connect America Fund if you want your blood pressure to spike. ISPs are notorious for taking taxpayer money and doing fuck-all with it.

They are fucking all of us with it. Does that count?

load more comments (1 replies)

Sure, but how is that going to make more money for rich people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jb007gd@lemmy.one 42 points 1 year ago

What about net neutrality? Does anyone remember net neutrality? I'd like that back please. I'd also like the opportunity to publicly flog Ajit Pai as long as we're dreaming.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I would be content with just stealing his comically oversized Reese's mug.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

How is that not already the standard?

[-] picassowary@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

where i live my choices are fixed beam wireless internet that caps out at about 75mbps, at&t dsl that caps at 10mbps, satellite or i guess Starlink

[-] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

But it's a healthy and competitive market right?

[-] picassowary@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

super healthy, very competitive

did i mention that i barely get 5G service at my home but if i walk 100ft down to the street i get service?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

At my house I get 500mbps. My store (40 miles away) gets 15mbps. I pay significantly less at home.

Not just that but you have to pay extra to avoid a data cap on the 15mbps line.

Datacaps are incredibly annoying, they are just a cash grab.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. That’s exactly what they are.

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago
[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Not only that, 100Mbps is so 2018. Quit pussy-footing around, FCC, make the standard 1Gbps, both ways. And make bandwidth caps illegal. I'm lucky enough to not have one but for years I had to put up with a 1TB limit from those Cox suckers until Verizon came to town.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Didn't we already pay for the infrastructure?

[-] bappity@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is this about that Connect America Fund where the ISPs took all the money and did fuck all

[-] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You'd think that would be criminal

[-] rusticus1773@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the United States, where consumers built the internet infrastructure that monopolies profit from and fight tooth and nail to prevent communities from providing high speed internet to its residents. Capitalism at its most corrupt: privatize profits and socialize capital costs and losses.

[-] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Gigabit symmetrical or GTFO.

I pay something like $110/mo for my symmetrical gigabit fiber line (plus static IP). This should be the standard, not 100Mbps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrrooklynMan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

why just 100Mbps? why not 250? that’s still pretty simple for them to do. also: net neutrality, dammit!

[-] bappity@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

$40 for 2Gb/s symmetrical FTW!

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lucky bastard

Also, where, and how?

[-] Jmr@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

sometimes I really worry for the US

[-] nostradiel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I pay 30$ for 1Gb/s down, 250Mb/s up. It's usually around 40$ in the Czech Republic.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And? CableOne promised us 300Mbps, we already had 100. Then they went and renamed themselves Sparklight...

Guess what went out the window?...

[-] norske@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 year ago

I lived just outside of Tucson, AZ during Covid. When we bought our house, we were assured that xfinity was extending service to our house and beyond shortly. We tried getting the service and they sent out a truck to do a site survey. Xfinity said “lol no”. Our options were CenturyLink dsl with top speed of 3mpbs down and 768k up or a narrow band wireless repeater service from town. None of those were able to even support a 480p stream of tv, let alone the needs of having to switch to 100% remote. We wound up having to use a shitty 4g LTE router that used some sort data plan through AT&T. 150gb data cap and beyond it throttled down to 3g speeds. At the time starlink was accepting people into a beta but not as far south as we lived in the desert.

Luckily we were able to sell that place and relocate to a much better place. We now have municipal broadband with no caps and a static ip. They are building out fiber services to the underserved rural places around town first and then building here and I’m excited to someday have fiber.

[-] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

It is bullshit that muni broadband is sued to oblivion while the incumbents are allowed to provide shitty internet while red lining rural and poor areas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And at least 50 up?

[-] mhz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm paying $25 fo a 20mbps ADSL, but I only get 16down/1up due to the cable degradation.

[-] limit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is pathetic.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
692 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
1050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS