148
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

When looking at generational mental ability we can't ignore stuff like when lead was banned and other environmental factors.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Such as micro plastics in every part of our body.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Which ironically seems to be less bad than lead.

[-] sosodev@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I have a hard time believing that an IQ test is a serious measure of attention.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Most importantly, that's not what this says.

It says the rise is IQ is happening, and they think a rise in attention span is also happening.

They're just saying it's a correlation, that's all.

But I don't think you know what a real IQ test is either...

[-] sosodev@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

That’s not really what the article says but ok. I like that you immediately assume I don’t know what an IQ test is lol.

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Lol I can ace an IQ test but I can't function for more than 13 seconds without some kind of mental stimulus, preferably 3 or 4 simultaneous external inputs. TV + Lemmy + bunnies. PC game + phone game + podcast. Yeah I'm smart but God damn do I have attention problems like I never used to. Our entire society needs a phone detox but I'm only doing it if everyone else does too.

[-] beetus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do I/ society need to detox because you have attention problems? How does your similar-to-adhd affect me? How does my phone usage affect you?

Sounds like you are the one who needs to detox.. but those are your words not mine.

Idc if you need six different stimuli to function, it doesn't affect me. If it affects you, you should change you

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Also make sure you don't have something like ADHD, often what seems like something that's caused by external factors may in fact be due to internal ones. ADHD can also become more apparent to you, or affect you more, as you get older, at least it did for me.

[-] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

How lucky we have trained professionals employed to check if it actually is!

That way they can check on it, and you can just read their report when they're done.

They take on all the hard work, and you can simply read if and how they figured out it's a serious measure. What a time to be alive!

[-] sosodev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Alright, so I did some reading of the research.

The attention part is “The task is to cross out all target characters (a letter “d” with a total of two dashes placed above and/or below), which are interspersed with nontarget characters (a “d” with more or less than two dashes, and “p” characters with any number of dashes).”

The participants are usually given 20 seconds per line and a total of 10 minutes. A controlled environment where the only thing you can do is this task seems like it measures some kind of attention but it might be not be generalizable.

I think the problem is that attention means a lot of different things. Often when people complain about lack of attention it’s within the context of the many distractions we have in the modern world.

So the scientific claim is “adult participants have gotten moderately better at the d2 attention task” but the article says “people are paying more attention”. To me that seems like clickbait from what is otherwise a reasonable meta analysis.

[-] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So the scientific claim is “adult participants have gotten moderately better at the d2 attention task” but the article says “people are paying more attention”. To me that seems like clickbait from what is otherwise a reasonable meta analysis.

Agreed, and unfortunately almost all science "reporting" has this problem.

Which is why we don't listen to people who haven't at least read the source material, and ideally have read and understood enough about the field and methods to be able to evaluate if they are reasonable for the task.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your implication that a study by "trained professionals" is proof of this is hilarious. Many professionals disagree strongly about the values of IQ tests, among many other subjects of scientific studies. A simple Google search would show you that OP's opinion on IQ tests is also held by many other "trained professionals".

[-] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A quick read of the first paragraphs of the article also shows that it's not the IQ tests that are the measure for concentration.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago

I only read the headline because I couldn't be bothered to read the article but yes I agree people pay much more attention today than before.

[-] rebul@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sorry, did you say something?

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

76 up, 1 down 1 dup post. eh seems okay. lrn2scroll reporter

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
148 points (99.3% liked)

science

14595 readers
17 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS