104

White House says it has evidence Hamas using Al Shifa hospital to run military actions (www.reuters.com)

submitted 10 months ago by goat@sh.itjust.works to c/world@lemmy.world

153 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

So? Don’t bomb babies. This isn’t hard

load more comments (97 replies)

[-] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

I keep seeing both Israel and the US say they have evidence but neither of them seem to be able or willing to show such evidence.

That by itself should make every single person concerned, because if they actually had evidence, they would put it right out there for everyone to see. What do they gain by hiding it?

load more comments (6 replies)

[-] UnspecificGravity@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 10 months ago

Good thing Biden is here to be the spokesperson for Israel for some reason. Show us the evidence or fuck off, and stop buying bullets to kill children while you're at it.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

The article shows the admin literally saying this doesn't justify bombing it and they don't want to see firefights in it.

load more comments (15 replies)

[-] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago

Ok that's great. Where's the evidence that's going to convince me it's OK to bomb a hospital full of sick and wounded because of what Hamas is doing in their vicinity?

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

"To be clear, we do not support striking a hospital from the air. We do not want to see a firefight in a hospital where innocent people, helpless people, sick people are simply trying to get the medical care they deserve," he said.

I don't think they're trying to.

[-] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Doesn't really matter if they are "trying to" or not when they do it.

Edit: https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/urgent-patients-and-medical-staff-trapped-hospitals-under-fire-gaza

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

Sorry, I guess my answer was want clear, they are not trying to give you evidence that convinces you it's okay to bomb a hospital. They explicitly say it doesn't justify it.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] febra@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Either show us or shut up. The White House also had evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We all know how that turned out.

[-] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Cool, so they're gonna show us.. and the evidence for bombing refugee camps, and the those for bombing trucks bringing aids, they must have enough evidence to keep us busy for a couple of months with what Israel did the last month.. otherwise they can fuck right off.

load more comments (10 replies)

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

Well then show us the evidence. And not videos of random calendars-I mean guard shift lists.

[-] coffee_poops@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

I DON'T CARE.

THEY COULD HAVE THE FUCKING GHOST OF OSAMA BIN LADEN IN THERE AND I WOULDN'T CARE!

IT'S A HOSPITAL.

[-] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Even if that's true - which I doubt - it doesn't excuse bombing the hospital.

[-] Metatronz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Man, wish everyone had been this fired up over Ukraine.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023

104 points (78.9% liked)

World News

38553 readers

2651 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.