41
submitted 11 months ago by anzich@feddit.de to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zoe@jlai.lu 18 points 11 months ago

Taylor Swift is not climate friendly, so are a lot of pop singers: very energy intensive ..

[-] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago

I'm not sure why you're downvoted. For the Eras tour it took an entourage of approximately 90 semi trucks just to move the concert from city to city.

[-] zoe@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

nice that someone would share similar opinion. although i dont mind being downvoted, as long as someone would justify their opinion reasonably as to why they would think otherwise. i am open for debates really (when time allows ofc)..but just leaving a random downvote is not really convincing..

[-] CadeJohnson@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

I have heard this, and I can imagine it is true, but have you seen any analysis? There must be a large crew traveling and lots of equipment - transportation is a big user of petroleum in general -- for entertainment. Though they say the entertainment is good.

[-] zoe@jlai.lu 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

exactly. but oil is heavily subsidized and costs money to extract and refine, and mass produced enough to be affordable, making concert tours cost nothing, but it causes a big damage otherwise. how about make half the number of tours ? that would be a good start. or make an onlyfan equivalent, for singers ? sound idea if u ask me

[-] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

You think online viewing at home will be appreciated by people who want to go to a concert as much as an in person concert?

People entertaining themselves and going to social events is not a moral failing. It's not the thing that needs addressing.

The production company for a touring live entertainment event can find ways to reduce their production of carbon emissions. It would be easier for them to do so if carbon emissions would be priced in line with the costs they create.

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Let's just stay inside our homes our whole lives!

[-] zoe@jlai.lu 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

better fund energy transition and you'r welcome touring how much u want, but just dont act like a hypocrite and show false solidarity. but americans are in a whole realm of its own. sometimes i wonder to myself that americans deserve their lot sometime, also while fucking up the rest of the world in the process

[-] iraq_lobster@slrpnk.net -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

in fact thats kinda hypocrite: if she really wants to show solidarity, she's ought to quit singing, but i doubt she has enough spine to give up the kind of income involved

[-] AEMarling@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago

The climate crisis ruins everything.

[-] Konlanx@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The stuff leading to the climate crisis ruins everything. The climate crisis itself is amazing and forces us to think about better solutions.

I really hope it leads to less cars, less pollution, more connection to nature and more human conditions everywhere.

I want a solution for the cause, which is fossil fuels, meat consumption (consumerism in general) and pollution. Even without the climate crisis we are experiencing now it would be great to have less of all of that.

[-] Resonanz@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

Man, these last days we have been cooked alive in Rio. The thermal sense is unbearable. Good thing rain just arrived, but I can't even imagine how hot that concert should have been. To say the truth, I'm surprised no more people died of heat over there.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
41 points (88.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5197 readers
803 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS