224

Will there be a pro version without in-app purchase like there was before? If I could avoid the in-app purchase I'd prefer it. There where weekly threads on Reddit when the in-app version failed to work correctly and I never had any problem with the pro version.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ljdawson@lemmy.world 119 points 1 year ago

Not planning to. Last year Sync for Reddit had issues with Google as they're clamping down on apps that are similar from the same developer.

[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Does that mean there's only going to be a subscription based "pro" version?

I was a Pro user on reddit, but I'm not really interested in yet another subscription, even though I understand that may be financially attractive for you. I'd be happy to make a one-time purchase, though.

[-] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 26 points 1 year ago

It'll be the same pricing model. Ultra is a subscription, pro is lifetime. It'll just be an in-app purchase now.

[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Makes sense if that's the case. Thanks.

[-] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago
[-] beatbrot@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

That aged poorly!

[-] Oneobi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

OK, that's good. I was kinda worried that subscription would be the only option.

[-] EtzBetz@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago

Will Pro become available as IAP, though? I'd maybe specify this. I did read this whole thread as if Pro was cancelled altogether.

[-] serv@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Can you do a separate app that acts like a licence key, they way apps like FX Explorer does it? Or does that have the same (or other) issue?

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

I'm in support of a separate pro version of the app. As a compromise, this could work, too. Though, I would prefer an app without any ad libraries whatsoever.

[-] fleece@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago

Why do you think this is? Are they pushing for IAPs instead of pro/lite versions of apps? Do you think this is a good or bad move?

[-] ljdawson@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Not really sure. Took over a month to resolve last time though

[-] Oneobi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Guess the other issue is that IAP bypasses family library so each member of your family group needs to cough up.

[-] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 2 points 1 year ago

It's to crack down on app spam

[-] Ducks@ducks.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Probably a good idea, so many people gave you misdirected grief over that

[-] httpjames@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

What was the point of having two different versions anyways instead of having one with an IAP?

[-] NightOwl@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago

I like the feeling of a clean app that doesn't have any ad integration at all.

[-] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 15 points 1 year ago

If I remember correctly pro came out before IAP was a thing.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

The in-app purchases can be buggy with amnesia hitting them once a while, making you install/reinstall just so google remembers you purchased pro. This happens when you have more than 1 google accounts on android.

[-] N1NJ4W4RR10R_@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Another reason may have been due to the in app purchase stuffing up sometimes. I believe it was a Google thing, but iirc sometimes it would just forget you'd bought pro within the app and start showing ads again.

[-] LdWilmore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Other than the already mentioned points, the old Sync Pro and Sync Dev didn't include the ad libraries in the app. Sync Dev was on beta track by default IIRC and had an internal test group like the current 100 limited users testing group Sync for Lemmy has.

[-] alphapuggle@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

I remember gravity box had a Paypal donation link and pro would be unlocked with your payment code. Not sure if Google Play allows this as it bypasses their 30%

[-] godless@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Donation links are a violation of Google's T&C and will get an app banned.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

How does it work for apps that are a part of other services?

Say a company has an app available to all customers that pay for some unrelated service, it would be weird to require them to do the transaction over Google Play?

[-] godless@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

In that case the company could make the app free, but it wouldn't be useable for anyone who didn't own the base service, I guess.

And users who'd want to subscribe to the base service must then be able to do so through the app, that's part of Google's requirements.

[-] UnknownQuantity@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Apart from removing ads I don't really need anything from ultra. I'd be happy to pay one off fee, but I won't be doing subscription.

[-] generalEdo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I agree I will pay a one time fee but the subscription price is to much for my budget of already existing subscriptions. Plus my pihole is doing a fine job removing the ads here at home where I mostly use lemmy.

[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

This. I want to just pay a one off fee and remove the ads and donate as necessary.

[-] Sup3rlativ3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm the same. Long long time user and was happy to pay for the app but a subscription isn't going to happen as it's complete overkill.

Very disappointed but I guess I'm staying with thunder.

[-] redDEAD@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

The subscription model is a turn off.

[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This. I just want an ad-free version. Pay for it one time and that's it.

[-] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Adfree one time payment is out now. Update the app.

[-] CMGX78@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I would make a one time purchase to support the developers, but if they keep the subscription model I'll just use Jerboa, connect or liftoff instead.

[-] wahming 0 points 1 year ago

Update your app, the option is there now

[-] Kocher@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bought Sync Pro twice, after problems with the IAP. Would gladly buy again just to get rid of the ads, even for a higher price, but subscriptions are a big turn off.

[-] lacabraenlamachina@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

If and when pro becomes available, I'm in. I'm in regardless, but will pay for pro if available.

[-] SRo@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So one time payment adfree is out now but ultra lifetime is still missing.

[-] Sup3rlativ3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's there for me, $170. I still don't see a one time purchase for ad removal though

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
224 points (97.1% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15088 readers
1 users here now

๐Ÿ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS