75
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/astronomy@mander.xyz
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 77 points 11 months ago

TLDR: meteorite

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 23 points 11 months ago
[-] Cyberbatman@lemmings.world 19 points 11 months ago

Kind of bum that the article did not mention how much it was worth

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 38 points 11 months ago

The researchers argue that the Maryborough meteorite is much rarer than gold, making it far more valuable to science.

๐Ÿ’€

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Just imagine how many science they could get if they traded it in!

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

At least 3.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 12 points 11 months ago

I think their take is kind of questionable. It may be more valuable to science but its monetary value is almost certainly less than gold.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

The writing is at morning program levels of goofiness; it's jarring. At 17 kg this meteorite would be worth over a million USD if it was gold. It's like the writer is taking a piss at the poor guy who hoped to get some money out of it.

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
75 points (98.7% liked)

Astronomy

3950 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS