57
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Kingsilva@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

I still wondered why, I've read the story over and over again.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 43 points 11 months ago

Stein has always been either a useful idiot or an active Russian dis/mis-info candidate

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Seems to me that it's 99% of American voters who are useful idiots.

The minimum wage hasn't increased in 15 years and you all are still voting Democrat or Republican and actively support a trillion and half of your taxpayer dollars going overseas to war. Idiotic is a very good word to describe people who convince themselves it's a good thing to vote against their own interests every two years.

[-] beefcat@beehaw.org 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Many democrats have run on platforms that include raising the minimum wage. Many blue states have much higher minimum wages than the federal minimum, with California going up to $16 in January. It’s not democrats fault when voters refuse to give them control over both congress and the white house at the same time.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

It’s not democrats fault when voters refuse to give them control over both congress and the white house at the same time.

They just had control of the white house and Congress.

What did we get for it? Another half trillion in war spending.

[-] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 11 months ago

Democrats have a slim majority in the senate, which is not enough to get whatever they want done without compromising, especially considering that two senators are not as left wing as the rest of the party.

As far as war and military spending goes, I agree that the party could do better.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

They have the presidency.

They could veto everything until they get what they want.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 7 points 11 months ago
[-] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's not really how it works. It would only make them look stupid if they did that, and increase the risk of being voted out in the next election. Because of the filibuster, legislation generally needs 60 votes in the Senate before it goes to the president. Democrats have 51 seats, with two frequent defectors. Imagine if Biden's record going into 2024 is that he vetoed every single piece of legislation.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's not really how it works.

You're right.

It's infinitely better that they simply pretend to be powerless rather than using the power we gave them to create meaningful change. It's too bad people can't eat excuses.

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago

The problem isn't voting. The problem is the candidates that run, and the massive lobbying and dark money industry that keeps people in power that benefit only moneyed interests. I sure as fuck had no desire to vote for Hillary or Biden, but the only option was to abstain or vote for a third-party candidate (who absolutely would not win) which would allow Trump to win. We're not able to truly vote for a candidate we want, we just have to vote against someone who's worse.

Even when we truly try to get someone in place who wants to make a difference and could do, we can't. In 2020, Bernie was going to win the Dem nomination. But the DNC changed the fucking rules and all the other candidates dropped out and supported Biden, and even if Bernie had made it to the convention, the "super delegates" could just decide to choose someone else. They literally will not allow us to choose the person we want. And Republicans are such hatemongers, that they're going to choose literally the worst person on the fucking planet as their candidate.

As much as we'd love for everyone to just decide to vote for third-party candidates, it simply is not going to happen. We are in an absolutely fucked situation where we can't make things any better, have no control over what's happening, and can only vote against someone worse. Further, many, many local voting precincts are heavily gerrymandered, making a fair vote nearly impossible.

actively support a trillion and half of your taxpayer dollars going overseas to war

I, and many, many others do not support this and actively oppose it

The minimum wage hasn’t increased in 15 years

The problem with this issue and nearly all others is lobbying and campaign finance issues. If we could ban lobbying, ban political donations, and force all candidates to use only public funds for campaigning, we could make a massive difference. But you know who decides if that will happen? The exact people who do not want the rules to change.

Also, if your post was, in any way, a defense of Stein, if I were going to vote a third party I'd rather choose a candidate who didn't have dinner with a fucking room full of Russian oligarchs

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I, and many, many others do not support this and actively oppose it

And yet you vote for it anyway.

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

The two party system is a direct consequence of the antiquated boring system US (and UK and CA) have. While it remains, voting for a minor party is a wasted vote.

Need ranked preference voting to make minor parties feasible like AU, or better yet go to an even fairer system of mixed member proportional like NZ and DE.

http://fairvote.org

[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

While it remains, voting for a minor party is a wasted vote.

If you're a wage earner, need an education, health care, an abortion, or working infrastructure... your vote's wasted almost everywhere in this country.

That's the two party system.

[-] sqgl@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago
[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

No it isn't.

All of these issues will remain the same no matter who you vote for.

The Democrats have had the White House and Congress twice in the last sixteen years, and even had a supermajority for part of Obama's presidency.

All we (and by 'we' I mean the poor and middle class) got for it was more expensive health care and higher war spending. We didn't get a minimum wage increase. Health care and education are now cost-prohibitive for tens of millions, and infrastructure in most areas of the country is declining. For an added kick in the junk, Roe was repealed when Democrats had the majority and the White House and they did nothing about it.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

Tell me you don't pay attention to or understand American politics without telling me...

The supermajority is the only time the democrats reasonably could have pushed anything through while the Republican party's only goal is to obstruct any and all progress. Any yes, during that time there was lots of infighting. We also guaranteed health insurance for the first time and passed the ACA.

Want change? Go make it instead of yelling at a bunch of people that also want change on a semi-popular forum.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

They're still choosing between the "no Dictator" vs. "no King" parties, after centuries of the country already being a Democratic Republic.

Any day now, they'll start voting for "I like Money" vs. "Plants crave electrolytes"... 🙄

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You left out “no one who voluntarily sat at a table of Russian oligarchs” and “no conspiracy nuts.”

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Apparently it’s because she’s not supposed to have multiple accounts and they’ve unlocked the old one she lost access to already.

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

So then she IS now allowed to have multiple accounts?

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 14 points 11 months ago

Huh? She opened a new instagram account that ended with “2024” that got shut down. That one she mentions in the tweet is the original one that she lost access to. afaik she’s only got that one account now, unless you can point to another.

(To be clear, I’m not a supporter.)

[-] marco@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So, as expected, a huge nothing-burger. They had a policy and enforced it in a reasonable way.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

I’m pretty sure what happened is she went to login to her account for the first time since going dark after her misappropriation of donor funds was reported in 2021, didn’t bother to go through proper channels to get something reset with instagram, made a new account and then played the victim when she got bounced by rules to prevent identity fraud.

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

That clears it up for me, thanks

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

No problem, I was wondering if I missed something.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

What a strange person

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37708 readers
155 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS