758
submitted 1 year ago by enu@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 101 points 1 year ago

It's time for Alphabet to be broken up into separate letters.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 year ago

I would settle for “broken”

[-] WolfhoundRO@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can't wait for the "D Corporation" to be born out of it

[-] FederalAlienSmuggler@feddit.de 76 points 1 year ago

Surprised pikachu face An ad company is gonna do what an ad company nets more profit.

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago

I feel like at this point it should be obvious but because they have their fingers in so many pies a lot of people don't notice.

Google is an ad company and basically everything they do at this point serves that. They should have changed their name to doubleclick.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Once claimed to stand for

[-] Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

TIL a new word "enshittification"

_enshittification entails these steps:

first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves._

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Cory Doctorow is usually pretty interesting. Here is the essay where he talks about enshittification. Not some huge revelation, but truth nonetheless.

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ngl i didnt read the article but this headline is already dumb. Ever since Google got any sort of popularity, it has been an obvious danger to the internet, net neutrality and any free projects that want to exist without being involved with google. If you have to state as your company motto that you arent evil then maybe you are already evil...

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain. It's absolutely true, time and time again it keeps being proven true.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 1 year ago

Google just wants to protect us guys. Pinky promise.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

In what should be surprising to Noone, Google was just paying lip service about what it stood for from the beginning. When their motto was 'do no evil' it was a lie, they just stopped pretending.

[-] owf@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Hard disagree. Back in its early days, Google was genuinely decent. They competed by building better stuff than everyone else, and that's it.

There was no decent free email and no free maps before Google. You used to have to pay hundreds for decent mapping software.

The good old Web 2.0 days, when companies were falling over themselves to provide free APIs and see what people could do with them.

Google started going to shit when they brought out Android and everybody started trying to build walled gardens, and went full evil when that moral vacuum Pichai took over.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Google was collecting your data without informing you from the very beginning. Just because they wrote good software and offered free stuff doesn't mean they weren't doing shady stuff in the background.

I still use Google services, but only because the free part of the trade is currently working in my favor since I block all their ads.

[-] StarServal@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Google became the thing they disrupted. Now all their services are shit.

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

all their services are shit

Many of their services are quite good. Their management and business operations have been turned to utter shit (for consumers). They've been told they need to make more money every quarter and they've run out of easy things to make money on, so they're now looking at their entire catalog with the sole focus of revenue generation and profit growth rather than merely being an impactful internet resource which is sustainably profitable.

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I have the opinion here that stocks should be harder to trade. If you bought stocks and had to hold them for a 5 year period, and instead got paid a dividend, then the push for quarterly results would not force companies to be quite as rapidly self-sabotaging. Corporate bonds instead of trying to beat the bell. IPOs and that market are the root cause to a lot of shit.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Was this article written by Holden Caulfield?

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Google's a phony!

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

"Anyway, I keep picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and all. Thousands of little kids, and nobody's around--nobody big, I mean--except me. And I'm standing on the edge of some crazy cliff. What I have to do, I have to catch everybody if they start to go over the cliff--I mean if they're running and they don't look where they're going I have to come out from somewhere and catch them. That's all I'd do all day. I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all. I know it's crazy, but that's the only thing I'd really like to be. I know it's crazy."

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
758 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
1100 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS