221

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.nz/post/3829409

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 95 points 1 year ago

Dark business. Why are the Brits so happy to just sit back and let this happen.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

am british. its infuriating. a mass of the uninformed voting against the self interest for over a decade at this point.

“Torys fucking the country? Better vote for them again!”

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because we're becoming increasingly like the US, where half of the country (or at least those who actually turn out to vote) are hellbent on voting for a party that doesn't give a single shit about their needs, just as long as they drivel out some racist shit now and again.

As @breadsmasher said, “Torys fucking the country? Better vote for them again!”

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Hopefully Reform split the brainless idiot vote in cause chaos.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Thing is: I really, really, really do want voting reform but... I don't think I can bring myself to support Nigel Fárage.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They still have their monarchy

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Most of the country are change hating small c conservatives who genuinely believe the state knows best and is totally trustworthy. They get their news from the Daily Mail or The Sun because Britain is the best country ever. Its the mindset that ensures we still have a class system, a monarchy and brexit.

[-] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

The recent article about kids getting arrested for words and it's positive reception should give you a hint.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago

The good news: Police are wearing body cams that they can't turn off.

The bad news: It's because the cameras are using constant facial recognition to tag everyone.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Where is the footage stored? As I am conscious it often goes missing in the US for problematic cases.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

How are they tagging everyone though? Where's this database they're comparing against?

If this is like any other government project it won't work, it will cost 10 million pounds, and is developed by a company that previously specialized in the manufacture of plastic cutlery.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

10 million pounds

Hahahaha. Gonna need a few more zeros there, bud.

specialized in the manufacture of plastic cutlery

But no actual experience in the manufacture of plastic cutlery.

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

The Met are already using it - just not (yet) on bodycams.

The company behind it, who supply the data are called Facewatch. I'm not going to link to their site but they're the ones supplying the tech and db. They did it by scraping social media sites as well as government documents and the plan is to add the UK Passport db data soon.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Where's this database they're comparing against?

Microsoft has had facial tagging and tracking software in the wild for at least a decade. It can also accurately estimate your age, race, gender, and even your mood. I'm guessing they'll probably be using that database overlaid with a criminal wanted list.

[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 47 points 1 year ago

Yo, Britonians: Shits on fire. Do something.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago

IMO this is pretty shortsighted and going to affect all the wrong people, skimasks and balaclavas are a thing!

[-] TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And so is a IR flashlight!

[-] CazRaX@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Easy enough fix for the government, just make them illegal.

[-] worldsayshi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Socially acceptable, healthy, and private, win win win

[-] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Bring back balaclavas.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Context from the article.

Each of the forces using the K-series cameras told i and Liberty Investigates that they do not, and never have, used the LFR function

Yes, it's cklearly something that we need to keep an eye on.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Sure they haven't. 🤦‍♂️

I commend your optimism/open mind, I've just seen the abuse by anyone in a position of authority too many times.

And I mean any authority, middle management at companies, etc. Many people struggle to resist using whatever power they have (myself included).

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I think enabling the functionality would require too much back-office and vendor integration to make it a feasible lie. Too many people would know about it - and the risks from lying and saying 'not enabled' are too great.

If they had been enabled - and found out - the recommended lie would be "we are currently undertaking a small-scale trial of the technology to assess it's effectveness. We will be report on the results early next year as part of a wider public consultation into it's wider deployment". (Why yes, I have worked in public sector comms).

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Or it means they're not using that specific function, but are still gathering data and training the AI or something.

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The Met are already using it - just not (yet) on bodycams.

[-] authed@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Where can I buy one of these cameras?

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago

Rishi Sunak, 10 Downing St London UK

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

He also had some oil drilling licenses for sale.

[-] authed@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Rishi Sunak, 10 Downing St London UK

I was being serious ;)

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Ah...

GCHQ Cheltenham, Hubble Rd, Cheltenham, GL51 0EX

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Seriously, you're full of shit.

The second "Cheltenham" isn't nessecary, just the street address and postcode is fine.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Hycybh

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Damn, who took a dump in your coffee this morning?

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Am I full of shit for putting down GCHQ, or for copy-pasting their address and not realising they'd added a second "Cheltenham" to it for no reason?

[-] qwadrant@lemmy.tedomum.net 4 points 1 year ago

How terrible China is in mass surveillance. After all, this is a dictatorship in China and Russia and surveillance of everyone.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
221 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
1005 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS