299
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Married 77 years. Longer than some people actually live, that's a huge achievement.

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 year ago

I'm amazed at comments thinking this is unremarkable. Just look at the picture of the state he's in. Very admirable that he was able to do this, I would not be surprised if he passes by not long after this.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

I think it's less of a "it's not impressive he did" and more of a "im not sure anything could have stopped him". He very clearly deeply loved her, and I really doubt he's particularly worried about the end potentially coming a tad bit sooner at this point.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

I had no idea he was in hospice care since February. In my experience, I thought hospice care was where people go to die quietly with a little bit of dignity that hospitals don't offer.

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Typically people go in when there's not much time left, but hospice is really just a commitment that you're not going to bother fighting whatever illness you've got or might get. People can go into hospice and stay there a long time, and even come out of it.

[-] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That's a common misconception about hospice. My Dad spent the last year of his life in and out of hospice with the the last 5 months in hospice care. The main difference is hospice is strictly palliative - no heroic measures if some major event happens.

[-] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what it is, which is why it's impressive that he was able to attend this memorial

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

God bless you, Jimmy. One of the greatest Americans in our history. I feel for him losing his soul mate. She was one heck of a lady.

[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

Someday, far sooner than I'd like, I'll look like that. I hope I can face it with the same dignity and sacrifice he's demonstrated.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Citizens look at 70 how he looks now at 99. Theres no way many of us are reaching that level of presence and health with the difference in healthcare hes seen and what we even have available to the public.

[-] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

I bet the most important factor in his healthcare is all the physical and mental exercise that he got from continuing to build houses for the underprivileged into his 90s.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Unironically yes. He kept active and engaged, while not having to worry about laboring his health away and hardly making it to the next year while riddled in debt.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Wow, he looks every one of his 99 years. Managed to outlive the two presidents after him, that's not bad!

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
299 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS