146
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sinkingship@mander.xyz 12 points 11 months ago

I mean it won't change anything much, listening or looking away. Just look at the whole conference, it seems pretty clear to me that there is no motivation to change.

If I learned today that the political meeting to solve the problem climate change is being held in a petro state, lead by an oil sheikh and sponsored by companies that have no ambition to change, I would assume that somebody wants to fool me or it's satire.

What I expect is a lot of talk, self love and emphasis on how great we're doing already, some vague ideas and plans and then back to business as usual.

But still, I think the author of this article is right. There is need to show political leaders, that we don't let us get tricked by their green washing and that we demand more, much more action and that we won't accept empty promises!

It's very tiring to just want to live in a world that doesn't kill us while most business men readily kill the climate for profit. And the hope that the future is worth living is fading quickly. But we need to stand up as long as there is a piece of hope left. We'll likely lose this fight, but at least we tried.

Very well said.

or its satire

Thats literally modern times.

Lifes better than satire ever could imagine.

[-] FrozenCorgi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are tons of politicians out there that want to do more. Hardcore green parties, climate advocates, straight up activists. They have been active for years and years.

Nobody votes for them. On the contrary, people are voting increasingly for the exact opposite.

And I mean, why wouldn't they? The climate disaster snowball is so goddamn big now that the actions needed to take to slow it down is growing increasingly extreme. And as the actions grow more extreme, the immediate impact on personal comfort convenience and quality of life grows. Why would anyone vote for something that objectively makes your life worse?

So instead of voting for that, people vote for the status quo. Maybe for those who commit to some token greenwashing at best. Maybe it won't be so bad, they say. Maybe it'll only impact brown people somewhere. Maybe it's not even real to begin with.

And so the snowball grows, the scale of the reactions needed to stop it grow with it, and the cycle perpetuates. As it has for the last several decades.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

“Pay attention anyway”, as we force a popup that blocks you reading our article about why you should pay attention.

Glad it’s at least getting some attention. In the same vein, two netneutrality adversaries in the US (Cloudflare & Comcast) get a seat on the FCC’s Open Internet Advisory Committee. That gets no attention.

Whoever makes these decisions need some embarrassment. Do we need to establish a “Corruption Hall of Shame”?

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They couldnt care less about what the dirty peasants do. They own us.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5189 readers
796 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS