466

Abandoned babies found decomposing in Gaza hospital weeks after it was evacuated (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The cease-fire is over, but not before it offered a glimpse of the war’s horrors to Palestinians in Gaza and people around the world.

As residents used the fragile truce to find aid, search for loved ones under the rubble, and head home to survey the destruction, a particularly disturbing scene emerged.

Seen in a video that moves through the abandoned and disarrayed hallways of the pediatric intensive care unit at Al-Nasr Children’s Hospital in northern Gaza were several babies whose unattended bodies lay on separate hospital beds. A blurred version of the video was shared widely on social media this week, a grim and graphic contrast to other scenes of families reunited as hostages and prisoners were freed.

In a piece he reported, Mohammed Baalousha, a journalist with the Emirati TV channel Al-Mashhad, said he found the decomposing infants when he entered the pediatric ICU in the health facility in Gaza City. The hospital’s staff and critically ill patients were forced to evacuate in early November as the Israeli military focused its ground assault on the city, with hospitals under fire.

NBC News obtained raw footage from the channel and has reviewed its contents.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 161 points 11 months ago

The world needs to act to curtail Israeli crimes against humanity.

At the very least sanctions and boycotts need to be enforced.

load more comments (8 replies)

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 125 points 11 months ago

Before someone tries to make the claim, no, the hospital staff couldn't have taken the babies with them. These were premature babies in oxygen-saturated powered incubators, which could not be moved.

Possibly if a fully set up ambulance was available for each baby, it could be done, but the IDF has been bombing ambulances too and there aren't that many available anyways.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 73 points 11 months ago

tl;Dr: short of just hitting "fuck it" and transporting these babies in a car or jury-rigging something, there was no way they were getting moved.

I'm a paramedic. The ambulances/gurneys/staff to do this kind of transfer are highly, highly specialized (and also, therefore, expensive). Even in the US, you'll typically just see one for each regional pediatric center, typically covering a range of about 200 miles or a little over 300 km for sane measurement fans. This is not something that any old ambulance service or EMS agency just has laying around. I wouldn't guess you'd find something like that in Gaza at all, given the state of oppression there, much less multiple units, much less in the middle of a military bombardment where they're convinced that they're transporting HAMAS tunnels in ambulances.

[-] charlytune@mander.xyz 35 points 11 months ago

I can't even begin to imagine how horrific it was for those hospital staff to have to leave those babies. I think it would break me.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah. I can't fathom most of what this has been like for people in Gaza. I also can't imagine just dead ass leaving a baby behind.* I have to imagine they thought they'd be back soon or that someone else was coming, or the babies were already dead and there were no body bags or time. This is painful to think about.

*Not a criticism, I'm awake when I shouldn't be, words am hard, can't think of a better way to frame it.

[-] livus@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

@conditional_soup these were not ordinary babies that you can just carry around, even if you're not under sniper fire and trying to evacuate a bunch of other wounded kids. Premies are tiny and vulnerable. They were dying from lack of oxygen.

The staff probably hoped that the forces who took over the hospital would have mercy on these babies.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

This, and other similar cases, are exactly why civilized countries don't bomb hospitals.

There are many people who are highly immobile in hospitals.

I have no respect for Hamas, but the IDF is at least as bad. They only try to pretend they are civilized.

They always claim Hamas uses hospitals to perform attacks, but their evidence is even less convincing than the WMD evidence Bush used to justify the Iraq invasion.

[-] rDrDr@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

There is absolutely no evidence that Hamas was using this hospital to conduct attacks (or frankly any hospital). The Israeli policy is terrorism, plain and simple. The goal is terrorism. The method is terrorism.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 118 points 11 months ago

Fucking hell. Like it's actual hell. God damn. Those poor families.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 81 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hell is full of people that deserve it, war is mostly innocent people. Not exactly the correct quote from M*a*s*h but close enough.

[-] Rezbit@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

https://youtu.be/JBt0sgNDQlY?si=jbLJyESNjSolulxO

Here's the 34 second clip! What an amazing show

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 9 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/JBt0sgNDQlY?si=jbLJyESNjSolulxO

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] lucien_the_megan@startrek.website 3 points 11 months ago

Based

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

I totally get it.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 81 points 11 months ago

Where the pro lifers at?

[-] conquer4@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago

They don't care after they are born. Bootstraps and all I guess.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] ooo_shiny@lemmy.nz 49 points 11 months ago

My son was in NICU. I thought of his time in hospital as soon as the news about the Palestinian hospital broke. This is terrible.

[-] GutsBerserk@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

A real time genocide is going on!

[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

"Decomposing babies"

Can we just disband Israel already...

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

Who cares? They've already been born!

-Pro Life Republicans who support Israel.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A blurred version of the video was shared widely on social media this week, a grim and graphic contrast to other scenes of families reunited as hostages and prisoners were freed.

UNICEF also warned in early November that “children in Gaza are hanging by a thread, particularly in the north,” and that Al-Nasr Hospital had reportedly sustained damage in an attack that impacted lifesaving equipment.

Doctors at Al Shifa, one of Gaza’s largest hospitals, which faced intense bombardment and raids by Israeli forces last month, struggled to keep dozens of premature babies alive due to power outages.

Both health officials said they notified the International Committee of the Red Cross to help with the patients left behind in the evacuation process but said that the ICRC has been unable to commit to working in such conditions since the beginning of the war.

“This is more evident when taking into account that the IDF assisted in moving newborns from the pediatric ward of the Shifa hospital to safety, as well as provide Israeli incubators in the process,” the statement added.

The original article contains 1,405 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

What happened to the IDF coming in and supposedly save all the kids? They couldn't even do their own propaganda op and just left all the babies to die? The israelis are true monsters.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023

466 points (93.3% liked)

World News

39112 readers

869 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.