98
submitted 11 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/news@beehaw.org
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This comes after an order to evacuate a city with >0.7 million inhabitants within 24h without preparation, with broken infrastructure and broken government, with a treat of invasion.

There's no way this happen without panic, and without people being left behind.

I fear we're going to hear more horrific stories as the dust settles.

[-] Fermiverse@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago

This comes with the Hamas having no interest to do any favour in Israel's direction even sacrifice Palestinians if it supports their plan.

This is war don't trust anyone, no news no pictures from both sides.

[-] livus@kbin.social 53 points 11 months ago

@Fermiverse the news that most of us are interested in is coming from respected medical staff, reporters, and humanitarian NGOs.

I have no particular reason to distrust those three groups.

There are more than two "sides" here. Personally I am on the side of innocent civilians, no matter what their ethnicity or religion are.

[-] Dr_Cog@mander.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

There were many innocent civilians living in Nazi Germany, and a lot of them died in the interest of stopping them.

We try to minimize innocent deaths in war, but when the group you are fighting against uses hospitals as military locations and innocent people as human shields, it becomes difficult to do so

[-] livus@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

@Dr_Cog

There were also horrific war crimes in WW2, including the bombing of civilians. War crimes are war crimes no matter who commits them.

I don't think it's really an appropriate comparison to make, but since you are making it, approximately 0.4% to 0.6% of Germans were killed by bombing in WW2.

The death toll in Gaza is already at 0.75% of the population, and growing.

a lot of them died in the interest of stopping them.

You are conflating innocent people with armed forces in this sentence. My point was that it is not the same "them".

[-] Devi@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

You are being drawn in by Israeli propaganda. Look at more balanced news sources, or just a wider range. The 'human shield' myth is particularly awful as it's being used to defend murdering innocent people.

[-] Dr_Cog@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

I'm not. I'm old, and have been following this conflict for decades. Hamas very often targets innocent Israelis in their attacks, and hides behind innocent Palestinians to make it difficult for Israel to target them. You can argue about whether it is justifiable or not that they do this, but there are many, many sources that they do.

[-] Devi@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

I'm also old and have been following this conflict for decades but apparently more balanced sources.

Israel claimed that they were targeting Hamas at Al-Shifa but they positioned snipers who shot doctors and nurses through the windows. If you're being forced to attack a hospital full of innocent civilians then you would be trying to avoid the innocent civilians, but that's not what it's about here.

Same as taking swathes of land since WW2, they are occupying massive areas that they were never given. They're not ignorant, they know exactly what they're doing.

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

The first casualty of war is truth.

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

But of course no one will act on calls to blame Israel for the hospital needing to be evacuated in the first place...

[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 4 points 11 months ago

I really hoped this wasn't true.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryA blurred version of the video was shared widely on social media this week, a grim and graphic contrast to other scenes of families reunited as hostages and prisoners were freed.

In a piece he reported, Mohammed Baalousha, a journalist with the Emirati TV channel Al-Mashhad, said he found the decomposing infants when he entered the pediatric ICU in the health facility in Gaza City.

UNICEF also warned in early November that “children in Gaza are hanging by a thread, particularly in the north,” and that Al-Nasr Hospital had reportedly sustained damage in an attack that impacted lifesaving equipment.

Doctors at Al Shifa, one of Gaza’s largest hospitals, which faced intense bombardment and raids by Israeli forces last month, struggled to keep dozens of premature babies alive due to power outages.

Both health officials said they notified the International Committee of the Red Cross to help with the patients left behind in the evacuation process but said that the ICRC has been unable to commit to working in such conditions since the beginning of the war.

“This is more evident when taking into account that the IDF assisted in moving newborns from the pediatric ward of the Shifa hospital to safety, as well as provide Israeli incubators in the process,” the statement added.


Saved 85% of original text.

[-] Sina@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I don't understand what mother would leave their baby behind while panicking. This is a horrible story that is perhaps more horrible that initially assumed.

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

Uhm, panic, bombing, threat of being captured? Being invaded... again?

[-] Five@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago

Also, WCNSF?

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

The mothers may not even have been alive and medical staff simply can't evacuate premature babies and all the ICU equipment needed to keep them alive.

This story is absolutely going to be used as "look how inhuman and barbarous these Palestinians are, good thing we're genociding them" and your comment is exactly what they're looking for.

But the reality is that if you shoot and bomb civilians, then threaten to bomb the hospital they're being treated at, this could happen anywhere in the world.

They weren't leaving babies to die and rot 6 months ago because they weren't being shelled and shot at and if they weren't being shelled and shot at now, they wouldn't have left those babies either.

[-] livus@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

@Sina no mother would, and under normal circumstances neither would medical staff. As the article states, staff were pleading for help.

These babies were in an Intensive Care unit. Most were premature babies who were supposed to be in incubators. They are vulnerable and need to be kept warm, may be tube fed or require oxygen. It's difficult for parents, who usually cannot be there all the time.

It is more likely that the mothers were unable to get to the ICU. We do not yet know how many died trying.

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
98 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers
80 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS